2016
DOI: 10.37236/6008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treelike Snarks

Abstract: We study snarks whose edges cannot be covered by fewer than five perfect matchings. Esperet and Mazzuoccolo found an infinite family of such snarks, generalising an example provided by Hägglund. We construct another infinite family, arising from a generalisation in a different direction. The proof that this family has the requested property is computer-assisted. In addition, we prove that the snarks from this family (we call them treelike snarks) have circular flow number φ C (G) ≥ 5 and admit a 5-cycle double… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following theorem shows that r 2 (G) is also a measure of edge-uncolorability. (ii) 1 2 r(G) ≤ r 2 (G) ≤ min{ 2 3 r(G), 1 2 ω(G)}, and the bounds are attained.…”
Section: Max 2-and 3-colorable Subgraphsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The following theorem shows that r 2 (G) is also a measure of edge-uncolorability. (ii) 1 2 r(G) ≤ r 2 (G) ≤ min{ 2 3 r(G), 1 2 ω(G)}, and the bounds are attained.…”
Section: Max 2-and 3-colorable Subgraphsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The chains P (1,3) (x 2 , y 2 ) and P (1,2) (x 3 , y 3 ) are defined analogously. By Lemma 2.4 of [104] the three paths P (2,3) (x 1 , y 1 ), P (1,3) (x 2 , y 2 ) and P (1,2) Interchange the colors on the chains; i.e., consider P (3,1) (x 1 , y 3 ) and P (3,2) (x 2 , x 3 ), to obtain a proper 4-edge-coloring c of G. Then e 3 can be colored with color 3, and we still have a proper coloring. Hence r(G) < 3, a contradiction.…”
Section: -Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The interested reader might find more information about snarks in, for example, [24] or [35]. Snarks with circular flow number 5 are known (see [3,17,20,31]) and no snark without a 2-bisection, other than the Petersen graph, has been found to date. Conjecture 1.1 is strongly related to Ando's Conjecture (ie, Conjecture 1.3) and the following holds: Proposition 2.6.…”
Section: Ban-linial's Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%