2016
DOI: 10.4172/2327-4417.1000167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree Species Richness and Carbon Stock in Tripura University Campus, Northeast India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the nation's future urbanisation transition, establishing a urban and peri-urban forest in Agartala, Tripura (Majumdar and Selvan, 2018), 40.14 ton/ha in an urban freshwater wetland in Sri Lanka (Dayathilake et al, 2020), 808.9 ton/ha in urban green site foothill, Eastern Himalayas (Pradhan et al, 2022), 220.81 ton/ha in an urban forest patch, Pondicherry (Khadanga and Jayakumar, 2018), and 279 ton/ha in main land use of Allada plateau, Southern Benin, South Africa (Houssoukpevi et al, 2022) (Table 7). The estimated carbon stock was found also higher in this study compared to other Indian urban forest systems, for example, 3.22 ton/ha in Tripura University Campus, Northeast (Deb et al, 2016), 6.85 ton/ha in an urban and periurban forest in Agartala, Tripura (Majumdar and Selvan, 2018), 92.13 ton/ha in Education Institute, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh (Anjum et al, 2020), 139.11 ton/ha in an urban forest patch, Pondichery (Khadanga and Jayakumar, 2018), 434.72 ton/ha in urban green site foothill, Eastern Himalayas (Pradhan et al, 2022), and 25 ton/ha in an urban park under cold climate conditions, Finland (Linden et al, 2020) (Table 7). Several factors influence biomass and total vegetation carbon, including the age of the forest stand, tree density, diversity, and basal area (Sahoo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the nation's future urbanisation transition, establishing a urban and peri-urban forest in Agartala, Tripura (Majumdar and Selvan, 2018), 40.14 ton/ha in an urban freshwater wetland in Sri Lanka (Dayathilake et al, 2020), 808.9 ton/ha in urban green site foothill, Eastern Himalayas (Pradhan et al, 2022), 220.81 ton/ha in an urban forest patch, Pondicherry (Khadanga and Jayakumar, 2018), and 279 ton/ha in main land use of Allada plateau, Southern Benin, South Africa (Houssoukpevi et al, 2022) (Table 7). The estimated carbon stock was found also higher in this study compared to other Indian urban forest systems, for example, 3.22 ton/ha in Tripura University Campus, Northeast (Deb et al, 2016), 6.85 ton/ha in an urban and periurban forest in Agartala, Tripura (Majumdar and Selvan, 2018), 92.13 ton/ha in Education Institute, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh (Anjum et al, 2020), 139.11 ton/ha in an urban forest patch, Pondichery (Khadanga and Jayakumar, 2018), 434.72 ton/ha in urban green site foothill, Eastern Himalayas (Pradhan et al, 2022), and 25 ton/ha in an urban park under cold climate conditions, Finland (Linden et al, 2020) (Table 7). Several factors influence biomass and total vegetation carbon, including the age of the forest stand, tree density, diversity, and basal area (Sahoo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…Biomass and carbon stocks are crucial quantitative aspects of forest ecology. The average aboveground biomass in this study was comparably higher than the other studies, For example, reported values are 9.58 ton/ha in Tripura University Campus, Northeast (Deb et al, 2016), 79.125 ton/ha in an urban forest, Jodhpur city, Rajsthan (Uniyal et al, 2022), 64.92 ton/ha in an soil organic carbon stock, in urban green site foothill was 50.82 ton/ha (Pradhan et al, 2022), in main land use of Allada plateau, Southern Benin, West Africa, it was 83 ton/ha (Houssoukpevi et al, 2022), and the value of soil organic carbon stock in an urban park under cold climate conditions, Finland was 104 ton/ha (Linden et al, 2020) (Table 7).…”
Section: Carbon Stocksupporting
confidence: 47%
“…The results obtained on mean AGB and C storage of A. saman (AGB=36.8 ± 18.9 Mg ha -1 ; C=18.4 ± 9.45 Mg ha -1 ) is higher than in urban forest of Tripura university campus, Northeast India (AGB=11.81 Mg ha -1 ; C=5.91 Mg ha -1 [40] [30]; and, Oakland, USA (22 Mg ha -1 ; 11 Mg ha -1 ) [46]. The population of A. saman composed of relatively larger trees (mean DBH=80.95 cm) hence stored good amount of biomass and C in its aboveground parts.…”
Section: Aboveground Biomass and Carbon Storagementioning
confidence: 77%
“…10 3 ), Mangifera indica (5.9 × 10 3 ), Syzygium cumini (5.3 × 10 3 ). Differences between species in carbon sequestration and storage capacity are mainly determined by the differences in size distribution of trees (Kiss et al, 2015;Deb et al, 2016) and the fertility status of the soil (Singh et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%