2012
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree species diversity increases fine root productivity through increased soil volume filling

Abstract: Summary 1.Although fine roots (< 2 mm in diameter) account for a major share of the production of terrestrial ecosystems, diversity effects on fine root productivity and their mechanisms remain unclear. 2. We hypothesized that: (i) fine root productivity increases with tree species diversity, (ii) higher fine root productivity is a result of greater soil volume filling due to species-specific patterns of root placement and proliferation, and (iii) differences in fine root productivity and soil volume filling a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
159
3
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
10
159
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Carbon content per unit of biomass may also vary, depending on whether stands are mixed or monospecific. Additionally, belowground biomass is difficult to estimate and often excluded from estimates, and niche complementarity between species can also occur belowground (Brassard et al, 2013). These issues underscore the need for more research focusing on carbon storage in mixed-species forests, in order to determine whether they fix more CO 2 than monospecific forests.…”
Section: Species Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon content per unit of biomass may also vary, depending on whether stands are mixed or monospecific. Additionally, belowground biomass is difficult to estimate and often excluded from estimates, and niche complementarity between species can also occur belowground (Brassard et al, 2013). These issues underscore the need for more research focusing on carbon storage in mixed-species forests, in order to determine whether they fix more CO 2 than monospecific forests.…”
Section: Species Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the SOC concentrations were lower in the control than in the thinned sites in the autumn. Thinning may have allowed for the establishment of shrubs and graminoids with higher decomposition rates than the conifers in the summer (Table 1, S1), which allowed the thinned sites to compensate for the reduced total carbon inputs through an increased proportion of more rapidly decomposable leaf litter and root litter during the autumn (Chen and Shrestha, 2012;Brassard et al, 2013). The SOC differed significantly only over the four sampling dates in the upper soil, and the warmer months (July and October) had higher SOC values than January and April.…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreased N release during decomposition seems unlikely because several studies on the relationship between plant diversity and organic matter turnover reported no or a positive e ect of plant diversity on N release (e.g., Blair et al 1990;Wardle et al 1997;Fornara et al 2009;Rosenkranz et al 2012). Lower dissolved N uxes in more diverse forests could instead have resulted from increased N demand of the vegetation as related to the greater productivity of more diverse forests (Morin et al 2011;Paquette and Messier 2011;Brassard et al 2013). However, forest biomass consists largely of trees which had an opposing effect in our study (Fig.…”
Section: Functional Relationship Between Plants and Dissolved N Uxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial niche complementarity would most likely be related to rooting traits. In boreal forests, neroot productivity increased with tree species evenness by more horizontal and vertical space lling in the organic layer in mixtures of deep-rooting and shallowrooting species (Brassard et al 2013). Additional functional niche partitioning would be related to the preference and ability of various plant species and their mycorrhizal associations to use di erent N forms.…”
Section: Functional Relationship Between Plants and Dissolved N Uxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation