2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree size distribution at increasing spatial scales converges to the rotated sigmoid curve in two old-growth beech stands of the Italian Apennines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(87 reference statements)
4
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Dziewolski 1991;Leibundgut 1993;Przybylska et al 1995;Piovesan et al 2005;Westphal et al 2006;Alessandrini et al 2011), the stands differed visibly in stem density (between 288 and 682 live trees per ha), a variation attributable primarily to under-canopy trees. The differences in the number of under-canopy trees influenced the differentiation index values, which were highest in Stand I, with the smallest number of under-canopy trees, and lowest in Stand II, with the highest number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dziewolski 1991;Leibundgut 1993;Przybylska et al 1995;Piovesan et al 2005;Westphal et al 2006;Alessandrini et al 2011), the stands differed visibly in stem density (between 288 and 682 live trees per ha), a variation attributable primarily to under-canopy trees. The differences in the number of under-canopy trees influenced the differentiation index values, which were highest in Stand I, with the smallest number of under-canopy trees, and lowest in Stand II, with the highest number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…von Oheimb et al 2005;Piovesan et al 2005;Westphal et al 2006;Alessandrini et al 2011), changes in species composition ), regeneration Roženbergar et al 2007), coarse woody debris (Christensen et al 2005), stand dynamics (Jaworski and Paluch 2002;Š ebková et al 2011), gap dynamics (Kenderes et al 2009), and reconstruction of natural disturbances (Splechtna et al 2005;Zeibig et al 2005;Nagel and Svoboda 2008;Firm et al 2009;Trotsiuk et al 2012). Only a handful of studies have profiled the spatial variability of the structural attributes in stand patches representative to steady-state conditions; that is, large enough to buffer the effects of natural disturbances and guarantee demographic equilibrium at an approximately constant biomass accumulation level (Dziewolski 1991;Holeksa et al 2009;Š ebková et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dynamic patterns of most species begin more vigorous growth at around the age of 20, with a DBH of 20 to 30 cm (Table 3). Some species displayed a narrow inverted-J distribution, which represents a typical distribution for uneven-aged forests [93][94][95][96]. A U-shaped distribution was observed for species like P. angolensis and E. abyssinica, which suggests that forest stand dynamics are primarily controlled by competition ( Figure 5C,E,F).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…CANOPY experiments suggest that a rotated sigmoid size distribution (sensu Goff and West [10]) with variable q-ratios may be required across the full range of size classes, as in a forest managed for old-growth characteristics [51]. Rotated sigmoid size distributions have been widely reported in old-growth, uneven-aged stands of various shade-tolerant species (e.g., [14,[52][53][54][55][56]), including those in the present study areas [45,57,58].…”
Section: Characteristics and Dynamics Of Sustainable Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 88%