2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree regeneration in active and passive cloud forest restoration: Functional groups and timber species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggests also that even though sustainable land management as a whole has a positive effect on the amount of local greening, revegetation and tree planting appears to be more effective than natural regeneration. This coincides with other studies, that found a faster recovery of highly degraded land due to active restoration practices such as tree planting compared to more passive methods 46,47 . On the other hand, natural regeneration is, although slower, often much cheaper 48 and can therefore result in the restoration of much larger areas, with a more natural species composition 49 if enough time is available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results suggests also that even though sustainable land management as a whole has a positive effect on the amount of local greening, revegetation and tree planting appears to be more effective than natural regeneration. This coincides with other studies, that found a faster recovery of highly degraded land due to active restoration practices such as tree planting compared to more passive methods 46,47 . On the other hand, natural regeneration is, although slower, often much cheaper 48 and can therefore result in the restoration of much larger areas, with a more natural species composition 49 if enough time is available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Natural regeneration does, however, show a significant increase in local greening pixels around a larger area than active revegetation. This coincides with other studies, that found a faster recovery of highly degraded land due to active restoration practices such as tree planting compared to more passive methods [55,56]. On the other hand, natural regeneration is, although slower, often much cheaper [57] and can therefore result in the restoration of much larger areas, with a more natural species composition [58] if enough time is available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As such, it is important to ensure that there are sufficient adjacent seed sources to restoration interventions, or planted trees with animal-dispersed seeds that attract dispersers (de la Peña-Domene et al, 2013), as this will ultimately impose a major filter on the initial functional composition of tree recruits. Additionally, other studies have noted the importance of including woody species that are slow to recruit in the initial floristic composition of plantings (Toledo-Aceves et al, 2021), such as shade-tolerant species with low SLA (Toledo-Aceves et al, 2022).…”
Section: Implications For Forest Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%