Abstract:Abstract. To assess how the decimation of large vertebrates by hunting alters recruitment processes in a tropical forest, we compared the sapling cohorts of two structurally and compositionally similar forests in the Rio Manu floodplain in southeastern Peru. Large vertebrates were severely depleted at one site, Boca Manu (BM), whereas the other, Cocha Cashu Biological Station (CC), supported an intact fauna. At both sites we sampled small (!1 m tall, ,1 cm dbh) and large (!1 cm and ,10 cm dbh) saplings in the … Show more
“…This is further supported by the fact that the proportion of neighbors that were conspecific declined significantly with focal tree size at all sites, particularly for sapling-sized neighbors. Numerous studies have reported strong conspecific negative density-dependent mortality in both tropical and temperate forests (Augspurger 1984, Terborgh et al 2008, Uriarte et al 2004a, Stoll and Newbery 2005, Chen et al 2010, Swamy and Terborgh 2010, Bai et al 2012, Comita et al 2014), particularly at early life stages (e.g., seedling and sapling stages; Zhu et al 2015). Our results are consistent with these other studies and demonstrate that such density-dependent mortality patterns are strong enough to structure forest composition.…”
Section: Effect Of Conspecific Neighbors On Local Compositionsupporting
Interactions among neighbors influence the structure of communities of sessile organisms. Closely related species tend to share habitat and resource requirements and to interact with the same mutualists and natural enemies so that the strength of interspecific interactions tends to decrease with evolutionary divergence time. Nevertheless, the degree to which such phylogenetically related ecological interactions structure plant communities remains unclear. Using data from five large mapped forest plots combined with a DNA barcode mega‐phylogeny, we employed an individual‐based approach to assess the collective effects of focal tree size on neighborhood phylogenetic relatedness. Abundance‐weighted average divergence time for all neighbors (ADT_all) and for heterospecific neighbors only (ADT_hetero) were calculated for each individual of canopy tree species. Within local neighborhoods, we found phylogenetic composition changed with focal tree size. Specifically, significant increases in ADT_all with focal tree size were evident at all sites. In contrast, there was no significant change in ADT_hetero with tree size in four of the five sites for both sapling‐sized and all neighbors, even at the smallest neighbourhood scale (0–5 m), suggesting a limited role for phylogeny‐dependent interactions. However, there were inverse relationships between focal tree size and the proportion of heterospecific neighbors belonging to closely related species at some sites, providing evidence for negative phylogenetic density dependence. Overall, our results indicate that negative interaction with conspecifics had a much greater impact on neighborhood assemblages than interactions among closely related species and could contribute to community structure and diversity maintenance in different forest communities.
“…This is further supported by the fact that the proportion of neighbors that were conspecific declined significantly with focal tree size at all sites, particularly for sapling-sized neighbors. Numerous studies have reported strong conspecific negative density-dependent mortality in both tropical and temperate forests (Augspurger 1984, Terborgh et al 2008, Uriarte et al 2004a, Stoll and Newbery 2005, Chen et al 2010, Swamy and Terborgh 2010, Bai et al 2012, Comita et al 2014), particularly at early life stages (e.g., seedling and sapling stages; Zhu et al 2015). Our results are consistent with these other studies and demonstrate that such density-dependent mortality patterns are strong enough to structure forest composition.…”
Section: Effect Of Conspecific Neighbors On Local Compositionsupporting
Interactions among neighbors influence the structure of communities of sessile organisms. Closely related species tend to share habitat and resource requirements and to interact with the same mutualists and natural enemies so that the strength of interspecific interactions tends to decrease with evolutionary divergence time. Nevertheless, the degree to which such phylogenetically related ecological interactions structure plant communities remains unclear. Using data from five large mapped forest plots combined with a DNA barcode mega‐phylogeny, we employed an individual‐based approach to assess the collective effects of focal tree size on neighborhood phylogenetic relatedness. Abundance‐weighted average divergence time for all neighbors (ADT_all) and for heterospecific neighbors only (ADT_hetero) were calculated for each individual of canopy tree species. Within local neighborhoods, we found phylogenetic composition changed with focal tree size. Specifically, significant increases in ADT_all with focal tree size were evident at all sites. In contrast, there was no significant change in ADT_hetero with tree size in four of the five sites for both sapling‐sized and all neighbors, even at the smallest neighbourhood scale (0–5 m), suggesting a limited role for phylogeny‐dependent interactions. However, there were inverse relationships between focal tree size and the proportion of heterospecific neighbors belonging to closely related species at some sites, providing evidence for negative phylogenetic density dependence. Overall, our results indicate that negative interaction with conspecifics had a much greater impact on neighborhood assemblages than interactions among closely related species and could contribute to community structure and diversity maintenance in different forest communities.
“…This outcome was expected, and is consistent with the results of previous seed-addition studies (Makana and Thomas 2004;Svenning and Wright 2005), and observational studies of adult and seedling community structure (Webb and Peart 2001;Terborgh et al 2008). The richness experiment further showed seed arrival to limit seedling species richness, a novel result in tropical forests.…”
Though it is recognized that both stochastic and deterministic processes structure all communities, empirical assessments of their relative importance are rare, particularly within any single community. In this paper, we quantify the dynamic effects of dispersal assembly and niche assembly on the seedling layer in a diverse neotropical rain forest. The two theories make divergent predictions regarding the roles of seed arrival and environmental heterogeneity in generating community structure. Put simply, dispersal assembly posits that the stochasticity inherent to seed arrival structures communities, whereas niche assembly suggests that heterogeneity in post-dispersal environmental conditions is more important. We experimentally sowed 15,132 seeds of eight tree species at varying levels of density and diversity. Every six months we censused the seedlings that germinated and assessed the abiotic and biotic conditions of each plot. We assessed the density, diversity, and species composition of three nested subsets , and all woody seedlings. We partitioned the variance in density and diversity of each subset of the seedling layer into components representing seed-addition treatments and environmental conditions at 6-to 12-month intervals. Seed additions initially explained more variance in the density and diversity than did environmental heterogeneity for seven of eight sown species, but explained little variance in the density or diversity of the entire seedling layer. Species composition was better explained by seed-addition treatments than by environmental heterogeneity for all three subsets and in all time periods. Nevertheless, the variance in community structure explained by seed-addition treatments declined over the two years following germination, presaging shifts in the relative importance of dispersal assembly and niche assembly. Our study quantifies how dispersal assembly and niche assembly may vary among the components of an ecological community and shift dynamically through time.
“…Forests that have been subject to heavy hunting tend to have significantly less vertebrate biomass and fewer individuals of largebodied species, particularly tapirs (Tapirus terrestris and Tapirus bairdii), white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu pecari), ateline monkeys, tinamous, curassows and trumpeters. Evidence is beginning to show the cascading effects of this absence on tree communities (Nuñez-Iturri and Howe 2007;Terborgh et al 2008;Stevenson 2011) and invertebrate assemblages (Andresen and Laurance 2007), which may eventually alter the dynamics of whole forests. As human populations continue to increase, there is concern that forest encroachment, better access to markets and the availability of firearms could exacerbate existing problems and eventually lead to the defaunation of forests across large areas.…”
Hunting in the neotropics is a widespread form of resource extraction. However, there is increasing concern that current activities are leading to the decline and extirpation of vulnerable species; particulary ateline primates, large ungulates (such as tapirs and white-lipped peccaries) and large birds such as curassows. Hunting patterns are expected to be a product of two principal influences: the value of return for a given amount of effort invested into hunting, and cultural factors that determine the prestige and usefulness of prey. Previous work has suggested that hunting profiles change in a predictable way over time, becoming more diverse and more dependent on smaller bodied species as preferred, large-bodied prey become scarcer. In this paper, we evaluate the hunting profiles of 78 neotropical communities in Central and South America. We investigate the uniformity of species preferences, whether communities that are geographically closer have similar hunting profiles, and whether the age and size of settlements can be used to predict the type and diversity of species targeted. We found that there was only a weak correlation between the structure of communities' hunting profiles and their geographical proximity. Neither a community's size nor age was a good predictor of the shape and structure of its hunting profile. Our data suggest that either the availability of prey or the cultural influences
123Biodivers Conserv (2017) 26:1877-1897 DOI 10.1007/s10531-017-1334 dictating the value of different species can change rapidly over small distances, and that older and larger settlements do not impact prey species distributions in a predictable way.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.