2014
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2014.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree of Sex: A database of sexual systems

Abstract: The vast majority of eukaryotic organisms reproduce sexually, yet the nature of the sexual system and the mechanism of sex determination often vary remarkably, even among closely related species. Some species of animals and plants change sex across their lifespan, some contain hermaphrodites as well as males and females, some determine sex with highly differentiated chromosomes, while others determine sex according to their environment. Testing evolutionary hypotheses regarding the causes and consequences of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify which of these candidate explanations are most relevant, it would be extremely valuable to document how well model assumptions match the properties of each category of parthenogens, and whether some categories are more strongly associated with a given geographic pattern. For instance, a database such as the tree of sex [133] provides a good starting point for cataloguing species where both sexual and asexual populations are found, their respective distribution, and candidate characteristics to explain geographic patterns (ecology, ploidy, hybridity, type of asexuality. .…”
Section: (A) Better Documentation Of the Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify which of these candidate explanations are most relevant, it would be extremely valuable to document how well model assumptions match the properties of each category of parthenogens, and whether some categories are more strongly associated with a given geographic pattern. For instance, a database such as the tree of sex [133] provides a good starting point for cataloguing species where both sexual and asexual populations are found, their respective distribution, and candidate characteristics to explain geographic patterns (ecology, ploidy, hybridity, type of asexuality. .…”
Section: (A) Better Documentation Of the Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sex Systems Database (Tree of Sex Consortium, 2014) was concatenated with a database of North American plant species that included introduction status (native/introduced) and weed status (weedy/nonweedy) (Kuester et al., 2014), in which weeds were defined as troublesome plants in agriculture, horticulture, ornamental, and natural areas. Sexual systems with very few occurrences were removed (androdioecy, apomictic, gynomonoecy, other, polygamomonoecy; N  = 12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we test this prediction by combining two existing databases: a recently published Sex Systems Database (Tree of Sex Consortium, 2014) with a database of plant species found within the USA for which the weed (weedy vs. nonweedy) and introduction status (native vs. introduced) are known (database from Kuester et al., 2014). We used this concatenated database to test for an association between sexual system (hermaphrodite, monoecy, gynomonoecy, andromonoecy, dioecy, androdioecy) and weediness status for both native and introduced species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of parthenogenesis is a long-standing biological question inextricably tied to the "paradox of sex" (Burke & Bonduriansky, 2017;de Vienne, Giraud, & Gouyon, 2013), because the vast majority of animal life reproduces sexually (Ashman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Geographical Parthenogenesis As a Natural Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%