2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-020-00501-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree Neighbourhood Diversity Has Negligible Effects on Drought Resilience of European Beech, Silver Fir and Norway Spruce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the main climate driver at high elevations is often temperature, at lower elevations moisture availability is in general more important (Babst et al, 2013). Under drought conditions, species interactions in spruce-fir-beech mountain forests does not seem to increase growth resistance and resilience (Gillerot et al, 2020), which could explain the increasing interspecific Syn det at lower elevations. Accordingly, Pretzsch et al, (2018) did not find any mixing effect in spruce and beech response to extreme drought events at low elevation sites.…”
Section: Climate Warming Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the main climate driver at high elevations is often temperature, at lower elevations moisture availability is in general more important (Babst et al, 2013). Under drought conditions, species interactions in spruce-fir-beech mountain forests does not seem to increase growth resistance and resilience (Gillerot et al, 2020), which could explain the increasing interspecific Syn det at lower elevations. Accordingly, Pretzsch et al, (2018) did not find any mixing effect in spruce and beech response to extreme drought events at low elevation sites.…”
Section: Climate Warming Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015), and subsequent studies have reinforced this finding (e.g. Pretzsch et al, 2018; Gillerot et al ., 2020). Although lower recovery and resilience of larger trees have also been observed (Gillerot et al ., 2020), results were mixed (Merlin et al ., 2015), and a recent physiological model suggests that large trees destined to die following drought may still exhibit high recovery and resilience (Trugman et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pretzsch et al, 2018; Gillerot et al ., 2020). Although lower recovery and resilience of larger trees have also been observed (Gillerot et al ., 2020), results were mixed (Merlin et al ., 2015), and a recent physiological model suggests that large trees destined to die following drought may still exhibit high recovery and resilience (Trugman et al ., 2018). Thus, in general we have much more limited understanding of how and why drought resilience scales with tree size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The course of individual tree growth has been well analysed for mono-specific stands ( Kozlowski, 1962 ; Zeide, 1993 ) and also for rich structured selection forests where trees can remain for a long period in the understorey ( Magin, 1959 ; Mitscherlich, 1970 ; Hilmers et al , 2019 ). Recent studies showed that tree mixing of species often ( Brooks et al , 2002 ; Pretzsch et al , 2013 ) but not always ( Grossiord, 2020 ; Gillerot et al , 2020 ) facilitates tree growth in drought years, and that the mixing effects depend on the species identity and combination ( Pardos et al , 2021 ). However, how mixing modifies tree growth in the long term has been hardly addressed yet ( Pretzsch and Schütze, 2009 ; Thurm et al , 2017 ; Pretzsch et al , 2021 ); this is probably due to the rarity of long-term observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%