“…Compared to the 1981 study, Douglas-fir planted at similar spacings in the Maple Ridge study (site index = 43.0 m; Reukema and Smith, 1987) averaged 5-9 m taller in height, whereas those planted in the 1925 study (site index = 30.4 m; Miller et al, 2004) averaged 1-3 m shorter (Table 2). For similar planting spacings, Douglas-fir at Maple Ridge averaged 3-8 cm larger in dbh than in the 1981 study, while in the 1925 Wind River study they averaged Comparisons with the Maple Ridge study suggest that competition intensity and associated mortality increased with site quality, resulting in less variability in tree size by years 23-25.…”