2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014wr015515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree-grass competition for soil water in arid and semiarid savannas: The role of rainfall intermittency

Abstract: Arid and semiarid savannas are characterized by the coexistence of trees and grasses in water limited conditions. As in all dry lands, also in these savannas rainfall is highly intermittent. In this work, we develop and use a simple implicit-space model to conceptually explore how precipitation intermittency influences tree-grass competition and savanna occurrence. The model explicitly includes soil moisture dynamics, and life-stage structure of the trees. Assuming that water availability affects the ability o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…podocarpa neither changed the general pattern of the Stipagrostis biomass–rainfall relationship nor affected the grasses dormancy state, but had an immediate and considerable negative impact on the productivity of Stipagrostis tussocks. This reduced growth of Stipagrostis on Crotalaria -affected sites was not compensated for by higher rainfall, indicating rather a competition for below- or above-ground resources such as nitrogen [12,49] or light [50,51] instead of the expected competition for water, as suggested by other studies [49,52]. Further, the reduced productivity obviously weakens the affected tussocks and reduces their ability to survive through the dry season [53], which explains the dramatically decreasing tussock density on Crotalaria -affected sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…podocarpa neither changed the general pattern of the Stipagrostis biomass–rainfall relationship nor affected the grasses dormancy state, but had an immediate and considerable negative impact on the productivity of Stipagrostis tussocks. This reduced growth of Stipagrostis on Crotalaria -affected sites was not compensated for by higher rainfall, indicating rather a competition for below- or above-ground resources such as nitrogen [12,49] or light [50,51] instead of the expected competition for water, as suggested by other studies [49,52]. Further, the reduced productivity obviously weakens the affected tussocks and reduces their ability to survive through the dry season [53], which explains the dramatically decreasing tussock density on Crotalaria -affected sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…due to the space-for-time substitution) with a Monte Carlo approach (MC) (Jakoby et al, 2014;D'Onofrio et al, 2015). For this, the old-field-cal was repeated taking into account the uncertainties in the data (e.g.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tropical savannascharacterized by the coexistence of a continuous C 4 grass layer with a discontinuous tree canopy (Scholes & Archer, 1997;Ratnam et al, 2011) the frequency and intensity of rainfall probably influence the relative dominance of trees and grasses, which differ markedly in their responses to variable soil moisture (Holdo, 2013;D'Onofrio et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2015). However, while the few studies that have examined this phenomenon agree that intra-annual rainfall variability affects savanna vegetation, they disagree fundamentally about whether less frequent, more intense rainfall promotes or reduces tree cover, a key ecosystem property in these systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%