2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree cavities in riverine forests: What determines their occurrence and use by hole-nesting passerines?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
105
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
105
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Carlson et al (1998) assessed a mean volume of nest-holes at 3.7 l (n = 8). Cavity volumes from riverine forests in Estonia (Remm et al 2006), calculated using cylindrical approximation, were also slightly larger (3.5 l, range 1.1-7.6, n = 12) than those found in our study area. However, it should be stated that all these values might be overestimated because the actual shape of the cavity of woodpeckers is not cylindrical.…”
Section: Nest-hole Sizecontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Carlson et al (1998) assessed a mean volume of nest-holes at 3.7 l (n = 8). Cavity volumes from riverine forests in Estonia (Remm et al 2006), calculated using cylindrical approximation, were also slightly larger (3.5 l, range 1.1-7.6, n = 12) than those found in our study area. However, it should be stated that all these values might be overestimated because the actual shape of the cavity of woodpeckers is not cylindrical.…”
Section: Nest-hole Sizecontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Kawada 1980, Yamauchi et al 1997, Wiesner 2001, Kosenko & Kaygorodova 2003, Remm et al 2006, see review in Michalek & Miettinen 2003, Pasinelli 2003.…”
Section: Nest-hole Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cavities that were up to 7 m high were accessed using ladder for biometric analyses (Rendell & Robertson 1989, Kerpz & Smith 1990). Measurements included: tree diameter at cavity height, smaller entrance diameter, internal diameter, and depth (Marini et al 2002, Remm et al 2006, Tamungang et al 2016. When a cavity presented more than one entrance, we considered the measurements of the larger one as this is the one that would permit easier access by predators.…”
Section: Successional Stage Classifications and Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, forestry management often removes dead or decaying trees, which can develop natural cavities, or provide sites for cavity excavation by species such as woodpeckers (Picidae; Remm et al 2006, Sánchez et al 2007). The absence of large diameter trees can also limit availability of natural cavities (Camprodon et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%