2017
DOI: 10.1214/17-ejs1305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree based weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment rules with censored data

Abstract: Estimating individualized treatment rules is a central task for personalized medicine. [23] and [22] proposed outcome weighted learning to estimate individualized treatment rules directly through maximizing the expected outcome without modeling the response directly. In this paper, we extend the outcome weighted learning to right censored survival data without requiring either inverse probability of censoring weighting or semiparametric modeling of the censoring and failure times as done in [26]. To accomplish… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, computation of error bounds can be a useful assessment of performance which is more precise than the presence or absence of consistency but not precise enough to obtain first order inference. These have been developed for many machine learning tools used in precision medicine, as in (Qian and Murphy 2011; Goldberg and Kosorok 2012;Zhao et al 2012;Cui et al 2017), and, more recently, have been improved for some settings in (Athey and Wager 2017). We also note the sample size formulas for the single-decision setting have been developed based on the value function (Laber et al 2016).…”
Section: Statistical Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, computation of error bounds can be a useful assessment of performance which is more precise than the presence or absence of consistency but not precise enough to obtain first order inference. These have been developed for many machine learning tools used in precision medicine, as in (Qian and Murphy 2011; Goldberg and Kosorok 2012;Zhao et al 2012;Cui et al 2017), and, more recently, have been improved for some settings in (Athey and Wager 2017). We also note the sample size formulas for the single-decision setting have been developed based on the value function (Laber et al 2016).…”
Section: Statistical Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the recursively imputed survival tree estimate of α , Theorem 1 of Cui et al (2017) addresses the consistency of estimating the underlying hazard function using a similar survival tree-based method. In both cases, a single tree is partitioned enough so that the failure and censoring observations in the terminal nodes are approximately independent while maintaining a sufficient number of observations.…”
Section: Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al 24 and Zhang et al 25 transformed the value function optimization to a weighted classification problem known as outcome weighted learning. Numerous methods have been proposed under this framework, [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] with developments in the areas of robust estimation, variable selection, and sparse or interpretable treatment regime using tree-based methods. Among the clinical endpoints considered by ITR methods, the time-to-event or survival endpoints deserve some special attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%