2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2011.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree approximation of the long wave radiation parameterization in the NCAR CAM global climate model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the subgrid corrections are calculated independently for each physical process rather than for all processes together as in previous studies 12,14,15 which allows for an ML parameterization structure that is motivated by physics and the calculation of the precipitation rate from the predicted tendencies. Third, we use an RF to learn from a high-resolution model whereas NNs have been used in previous studies that learned from a high-resolution model 10,12,14,15 and RFs were used only to emulate conventional parameterizations 13,34 . Parameterizations based on an RF have advantages in that their predictions automatically satisfy physical properties in the training data (without being imposed explicitly 23 ) and they make conservative predictions for samples outside of the training data which may help with the robustness of their online performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the subgrid corrections are calculated independently for each physical process rather than for all processes together as in previous studies 12,14,15 which allows for an ML parameterization structure that is motivated by physics and the calculation of the precipitation rate from the predicted tendencies. Third, we use an RF to learn from a high-resolution model whereas NNs have been used in previous studies that learned from a high-resolution model 10,12,14,15 and RFs were used only to emulate conventional parameterizations 13,34 . Parameterizations based on an RF have advantages in that their predictions automatically satisfy physical properties in the training data (without being imposed explicitly 23 ) and they make conservative predictions for samples outside of the training data which may help with the robustness of their online performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A promising and increasingly explored approach to accelerate or improve parametrizations is the use of machine learning techniques [7]. The application of machine learning to accelerate expensive radiative transfer computations was one of the first uses of machine learning in forward modelling in the atmospheric sciences [8], and a range of studies have used machine learning to predict vertical profiles of longwave [8][9][10][11][12][13] and shortwave [10,11,13] radiative fluxes in weather and climate models. These end-to-end approaches, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krasnopolsky et al (2010) presented impressive results for an emulator for the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for General Circulation Models (RRTMG; Clough et al, 2005; Iacono et al, 2008), which improved computational speed by 16–60 times in comparison to the original scheme, while preserving long‐term (17‐yr) stability. In Belochitski et al (2011), the NN‐based radiation emulator provided better performance than the emulators based on the Classification and Regression Tree (CART). Recently, Pal et al (2019) achieved a tenfold speed improvement and 90–95% accuracy using a deep neural network (DNN), indicating a greater computational burden in DNN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%