2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14708-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree and Forest Measurement

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absenee of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant proteetive laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
1
12

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
80
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“….45222 (12) Furthermore, when applying Chave et al [39], we extracted ρ values from the global wood density database [40,41] and subsequently calculated a mean ρ value, which was then used for the graphical display of this model. a Carbon converted to biomass as B "ˆC 47˙ˆ1 00; b ρ (g/cm 3 ) is the species-specific mean wood specific gravity (g/cm 3 ) extracted from the global wood density database [40,41].…”
Section: Model Development and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….45222 (12) Furthermore, when applying Chave et al [39], we extracted ρ values from the global wood density database [40,41] and subsequently calculated a mean ρ value, which was then used for the graphical display of this model. a Carbon converted to biomass as B "ˆC 47˙ˆ1 00; b ρ (g/cm 3 ) is the species-specific mean wood specific gravity (g/cm 3 ) extracted from the global wood density database [40,41].…”
Section: Model Development and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calipers, a device used to measure the distance between two opposite sides, can easily measure the diameter or cross-section of a tree trunk [10]. With advancements in equipment, modern methods of collecting forest inventory data include laser rangefinders [11], terrestrial light detection and ranging (LiDAR; [12,13]), and even smartphone applications [14], which improve efficiency and data quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a constant increment rate of 0.017 yr -1 can be safely ex-tended to biomass and carbon stock increment. In addition, (iii) under the range of conditions of the surveyed stands, the annual cork increment of individual trees was not influenced by the total number of trees in the stand (r = -0.128, p = 0.28; no significant correlation was found even considering the transformations of total number of trees according to power values 0.5, 2 and -1) or by the cork age (r = 0.038, p = 0.75; no significant correlation was found even considering the transformations of cork age according to power values 0.5, 2 and -1), while it was significantly correlated (r = 0.352, p < 0.01) to the stand top height (the mean height of the dominant trees in a stand), which is taken as an indicator of site productive capacity in uneven-aged stands (West 2009); (iv) annual increment of cork mass at stand level was significantly correlated to the stand top height (r = 0.442, p < 0.001) and the total number of productive trees in the stand (r = 0.811, p < 0.001); (v) above-ground carbon stock at stand level was significantly correlated to the stand top height (r = 0.290, p = 0.01) and the number of trees (r = 0.721, p < 0.001); (vi) stand basal area proved to be highly correlated to the number of trees (r = 0.777, p < 0.001), the number of productive trees (r = 0.665, p < 0.001), and the stand top height (r = 0.272, p = 0.02).…”
Section: Annual Cork Mass Production and Aboveground Carbon Stockmentioning
confidence: 90%