Treaty Ports in China: Their Genesis, Development, and Influence

Abstract

China was forced to open itself to trade by the Western powers in the nineteenth century. Led by the British, these powers wanted to ensure they were able to import their goods (the most lucrative being opium) and waged two wars to do so. The First Opium War was fought between 1839 and 1842, and the Second (also known as the Arrow War) from 1856 to 1860. These Wars led to a series of treaties, beginning with the Treaty of Nanking (signed with the British on August 29, 1842), which ended the First Opium War; the Second Opium War led to the Treaty of Tientsin (actually a series of agreements with Britain and France ending the first phase of the conflict, and signed in June 1858) and the Convention of Peking (three treaties, with Britain, France, and Russia, respectively, signed on November 14, 1860). Known collectively as the "unequal treaties," these were only three of a number of such "agreements" foisted on an unwilling China and rightly seen as a low point in the country's history. The Treaty of Nanking ceded Hong Kong Island to Britain in perpetuity and stipulated that five ports were to be opened to foreign trade: Canton (Guangzhou), Amoy (Xiamen), Foochow (Fuzhou), Ningpo (Ningbo), and Shanghai. These became known as Treaty Ports and were the first in an ever-increasing series of settlements that spread themselves across the country until January 11, 1943, when the Chinese and the British signed the Treaty for the Relinquishment of ExtraTerritorial Rights in China, ending the system after 101 years. A number of recently published books examine the Treaty Ports, as well as their genesis, and influence on urbanization in China. The reissuing of Jacques M. Downs's The Golden Ghetto: The American Commercial Community at Canton and the Shaping of American China Policy, 1784-1844 portrays the American community at Canton in the decades up to the First Opium War-a period culminating with the Sino-American Treaty of Wanghia (July 3, 1844). This was a treaty that not only stressed international friendship but also introduced the concept of "extraterritoriality" (immunity to prosecution for foreigners under Chinese law). Robert Nield's China's

Urban Governance, Economic Transformation, and Land Use: A Case Study on the Jimei Peninsula, Xiamen, China, 1936–2023

“…Xiamen was a pilot city for the United Nations Partnerships in the Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) in 1994 [22]. Earlier, in the 19th century, Amoy (Xiamen) was one of China's foreign treaty ports [23], which were the instruments that forced China to open up to the world, and also the places that could more readily adapt to globalization [24]. The difference between Xiamen and other treaty ports is that it is an island.…”

Global Chinese migration in geographical perspective: a Kolkata (Calcutta) case study

“…Tracing the history of Chinese overseas migration from mainland China to varied destinations, either through desperation or driven by political turmoil, the ‘ treaty ports’ (Downs 1997 ; Nield 2015 ; Bracken 2018 ) situated in the coastal provinces of China acted as driving engine to search for new destinations. Bracken ( 2018 ) in the article on the genesis and influence of treaty ports in China put forth the first (1839–1842) and second (1856–1860) Opium wars (Downs 1997 ; Nield 2015 ; cited by Bracken 2018 ; also mentioned by Mei 1979 ) as the major discourse of political happenings behind the emergence of treaty ports. After the Opium War under the ‘treaty system’, Western power was clamped upon Chinese seaports (Kuhn 2006 ).…”

Rethinking China’s Rural Revitalization from a Historical Perspective

“…Development of treaty port cities transplanted Western development models, creating an exclusively urban phenomenon in late imperial China. 18 Treaty ports in China severed the traditional connections between urban and rural areas. First, the treaty port cities attracted a lot of foreign and local domestic capital to develop industries such as cotton textiles and garments for foreign trade.…”