2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment with Twin-block appliance followed by fixed appliance therapy in a growing Class II patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Class II malocclusion is one of the most common problems for which patients seek orthodontic treatment, and is a major and common challenge to orthodontists . Class II correction techniques include a variety of extraction protocols, palatal expansion mechanisms, extraoral traction, functional appliances and surgical repositioning of the jaws . The selection of appliances varies depending on the clinician's priorities, type of anomaly, patient's growth pattern, severity of the anteroposterior discrepancy, patient age and compliance …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Class II malocclusion is one of the most common problems for which patients seek orthodontic treatment, and is a major and common challenge to orthodontists . Class II correction techniques include a variety of extraction protocols, palatal expansion mechanisms, extraoral traction, functional appliances and surgical repositioning of the jaws . The selection of appliances varies depending on the clinician's priorities, type of anomaly, patient's growth pattern, severity of the anteroposterior discrepancy, patient age and compliance …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful understanding of the biomechanics using TSADs could broaden the scope and boundaries of conventional fixed treatment. Various biomechanics have been applied to correct severe skeletal and dental Class II variations. However, the biomechanics for total mesialization of the mandibular dentition has rarely been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations revealed that the most significant effects of functional therapies are the dentoalveolar modifications (8) since these appliances are supported by teeth rather than the maxillary and mandibular bone. Placement of functional appliances causes displacement of condyle in the glenoid fossa, and stimulates growth of mandibular growth sites meaning condylar cartilage, condylar neck area and ramus (9). The efficacy of treatment highly depends on the growth potential and response of condylar cartilage and other mandibular growth sites (9,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Placement of functional appliances causes displacement of condyle in the glenoid fossa, and stimulates growth of mandibular growth sites meaning condylar cartilage, condylar neck area and ramus (9). The efficacy of treatment highly depends on the growth potential and response of condylar cartilage and other mandibular growth sites (9,10). Moreover, there is still controversy on whether growth modification actually increases the total mandibular length or it only increases the rate of the genetically expected amount of growth (9,11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is beneficial in the correction of Class II malocclusion, since the functional appliances exert forces forward and downward in the anteroinferior region, as consequence of the increase of the vertical development and mesialization of the mandibular molar, besides helping in the leveling of the curve of Spee. 42,43 The increase in the vertical development of the mandibular molars has already been described in other occasions in the literature. 20,24 Dental relationship:…”
Section: Maxillary Dentoalveolar Componentmentioning
confidence: 56%