2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment sensitivity of implicit threat evaluation, avoidance tendency and visual working memory bias in specific phobia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In time, if our findings can be replicated, one might try to use implicit avoidance tendencies, and the degree to which they occur for different stimuli, as an additional indicator of PTSD severity before treatment. In line with this, another clinically important question is whether the implicit avoidance of high-threat stimuli remains after treatment, or whether it diminishes with successful treatment, as in spider phobics (see Reinecke, Soltau, Hoyer, Becker, & Rinck, 2012). Moreover, the degree to which implicit avoidance remains present—or remains generalized—might be an independent predictor of relapse after treatment, next to strategic or explicit avoidance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In time, if our findings can be replicated, one might try to use implicit avoidance tendencies, and the degree to which they occur for different stimuli, as an additional indicator of PTSD severity before treatment. In line with this, another clinically important question is whether the implicit avoidance of high-threat stimuli remains after treatment, or whether it diminishes with successful treatment, as in spider phobics (see Reinecke, Soltau, Hoyer, Becker, & Rinck, 2012). Moreover, the degree to which implicit avoidance remains present—or remains generalized—might be an independent predictor of relapse after treatment, next to strategic or explicit avoidance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We speculate that neocortical processing in the otherwise healthy brain underpins the more complex aspects of phobic behaviour (such as LC's elaborate premorbid avoidance strategies), while impaired neocortical processing (e.g., following onset of SemD) may remove the cognitive significance of the phobic situation along with its autonomic resonance. It may be that attenuation of both these components of the phobic experience is required to “cure” the phobia, as indeed psychologically based treatment strategies would suggest [34, 35]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinally, we could replicate effectiveness of computerised, one-session CBT for reducing subjective and behavioural measures of spider fear immediately following one-session treatment and further reduced until 1-month FU (Müller et al, 2011). Cognitive biases of avoidance and implicit fear evaluation were not affected by short computerised CBT treatment, however, which contrasts earlier work where a longer in-vivo setting was used (Reinecke et al, 2012). Results from exploratory analyses further showed that these cognitive biases at 1-day FU did not were more pronounced before treatment in the earlier study both on the EAST and the AAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Threat bias was assessed using the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task (EAST) and the Approach Avoidance Task (AAT) with fear-related stimuli that were used in previous research (Reinecke et al, 2010(Reinecke et al, , 2012Rinck & Becker, 2007) the images. This approach was validated in previous research and had shown that it decreased self-report (i.e., FSQ) and behavioural (i.e., BAT) spider fear post-treatment and until 1month FU when compared to non-treatment controls (Müller et al, 2011).…”
Section: Threat Bias Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%