2023
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment Results of Vocal Process Granuloma: Intubation versus Contact Granuloma

Abstract: Introduction Contact granulomas (CGs) and intubation granulomas (IGs) are known to have different clinical manifestations despite having the same pathological features. Objective The purpose of the present study was to analyze the treatment results for CG and IG and to obtain clinical information. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with vocal process granuloma (VPG) between January 2015 and December 2018. The patient's age, sex, medical history, le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that the treatment of CGs and IGs is similar, with the treatment of CGs being based on conservative vocal therapy (which may include vocal rest and speech therapy), along with the treatment of any potential predisposing causes (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux, etc.). However, according to recent findings, the CGs and IGs groups responded differently to combined drug therapy, with the IGs group responding better to combined PPI and SI therapy than the CGs group [16]. There may be three reasons for this result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been suggested that the treatment of CGs and IGs is similar, with the treatment of CGs being based on conservative vocal therapy (which may include vocal rest and speech therapy), along with the treatment of any potential predisposing causes (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux, etc.). However, according to recent findings, the CGs and IGs groups responded differently to combined drug therapy, with the IGs group responding better to combined PPI and SI therapy than the CGs group [16]. There may be three reasons for this result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%