1980
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(80)90523-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment results in males with breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher age at diagnosis does not entail a worse prognosis, according to our study and several others in which survival figures corrected for age have been compared (Morgan, 1969;Mausner, 1969;Peltokallio & Kalima, 1969;The Cancer Registry of Norway, 1975;Robison & Montague, 1982). The finding contrasts with the regular trend toward a more favourable course in younger patients, which was recently established for female breast cancer in Sweden (Adami et al, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A higher age at diagnosis does not entail a worse prognosis, according to our study and several others in which survival figures corrected for age have been compared (Morgan, 1969;Mausner, 1969;Peltokallio & Kalima, 1969;The Cancer Registry of Norway, 1975;Robison & Montague, 1982). The finding contrasts with the regular trend toward a more favourable course in younger patients, which was recently established for female breast cancer in Sweden (Adami et al, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…We therefore consider the validity of the study as acceptable, and accordingly regard the results as representative for the Swedish population. Although the results are based, as far as we know, on the largest material published hitherto, the number of patients available for analysis after more than 10 years was so small that the possible influence of a sampling error ( Mausner 1969;Crichlow et al, 1972b;Langlands 8~~~~~~~~~~et al, 1976;Ribeiro, 1977;Morgan, 1979;Robison & Montague, 1982) showed that the Swedish 0~~~~~~~~patients had approximately the same clinical picture F-~~~~~~~~~a t presentation and included the same proportion of cases in stage I. However, there were somewhat more patients in stage II, whereas in other series there have been more stage III and IV patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like in female breast cancer the most important prognostic factors are tumor size and lymph node status both of which are strongly correlated: N+ in 25% of patients with T1 tumor versus 60% in patients with T4 tumors [7]. Relative 5-year survival rate of node-negative patients amounted to favorable 80-85% as opposed to 30% of nodepositive patients [6,[9][10][11]. When allowing for the major prognostic factors, the outcomes of female and male breast carcinoma seem to be comparable [5,6,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zur Optimierung der lokalen Tumorkontrolle sollte zumindest bei größeren Primärtumoren (> 2-3 cm), insbesondere wenn Haut-und/oder Burstwandinfiltration vorliegt oder mehrere tumorbefallene Lymphknoten gefunden werden, eine Nachbestrahlung vorgenommen werden. Wahl der Bestrahlungsfelder und Dosis sind am Vorgehen beim Mammakarzinom der Frau orientiert [40][41][42]. Wegen der meist zentralen Lage der Tumoren ist ein homolaterales Parasternalfeld einzubeziehen.…”
Section: Strahlentherapieunclassified