Abstract:AIM:To conduct a multicentre retrospective review of virological response rates in Asians infected with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treated with combination interferon and ribavirin and then to compare their responses to that among Caucasians. METHODS: Asian patients infected with genotype 1 CHC treated at 4 Australian centres between 2001 to 2005 were identified through hospital databases. Baseline demographic characteristics, biochemical, virological and histological data and details of treatment we… Show more
“…Moreover, Asian HCV patients had a higher frequency of the common homozygote. Therefore, as demonstrated in previous studies (45,46), Asian HCV patients had a better response to treatment than European patients in this study. Ge et al (12) found that the SVR rates across different population groups displayed a striking concordance with C allele frequency.…”
Abstract. The purpose of this present meta-analysis is to provide an accurate estimation of the association between two IL28B polymorphisms (rs8099917 and rs12979860) and sustained virological response (SVR) to standard treatment of patients of different racial descent infected with different genotypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV), and also to investigate the possible factors in the IL28B gene that contribute to the different SVR rates of patients with different subtypes of HCV infection across different populations. The electronic database PubMed was searched. Asian patients with a common homozygote (TT vs. TG/GG, OR=3.17; CC vs. CT/TT, OR=3.75) attained a higher rate of SVR, and a similar result was observed in European patients (TT vs. TG/GG, OR=1.74; CC vs. CT/TT, OR=2.50). Furthermore, HCV1-infected patients with a common homozygote (TT vs. TG/GG, OR=2.95; CC vs. CT/TT, OR=4.34) appeared to have a higher SVR rate than those with HCV2/3 (TT vs. TG/GG, OR=1.56; CC vs. CT/TT, OR=1.37). The frequency of the common homozygote in Asian patients was high, followed by European patients and African patients. In all, Asian patients attained a higher SVR rate than European patients (P<0.05). Patients with HCV1 infection had a lower SVR rate than those with HCV2/3 infection (P<0.001). Our results suggest that both the common allele frequency and racial descent itself contribute to the difference in SVR rates across different population groups, and the common allele frequency may partly elucidate the different SVR rates in patients with different genotypes of HCV.
“…Moreover, Asian HCV patients had a higher frequency of the common homozygote. Therefore, as demonstrated in previous studies (45,46), Asian HCV patients had a better response to treatment than European patients in this study. Ge et al (12) found that the SVR rates across different population groups displayed a striking concordance with C allele frequency.…”
Abstract. The purpose of this present meta-analysis is to provide an accurate estimation of the association between two IL28B polymorphisms (rs8099917 and rs12979860) and sustained virological response (SVR) to standard treatment of patients of different racial descent infected with different genotypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV), and also to investigate the possible factors in the IL28B gene that contribute to the different SVR rates of patients with different subtypes of HCV infection across different populations. The electronic database PubMed was searched. Asian patients with a common homozygote (TT vs. TG/GG, OR=3.17; CC vs. CT/TT, OR=3.75) attained a higher rate of SVR, and a similar result was observed in European patients (TT vs. TG/GG, OR=1.74; CC vs. CT/TT, OR=2.50). Furthermore, HCV1-infected patients with a common homozygote (TT vs. TG/GG, OR=2.95; CC vs. CT/TT, OR=4.34) appeared to have a higher SVR rate than those with HCV2/3 (TT vs. TG/GG, OR=1.56; CC vs. CT/TT, OR=1.37). The frequency of the common homozygote in Asian patients was high, followed by European patients and African patients. In all, Asian patients attained a higher SVR rate than European patients (P<0.05). Patients with HCV1 infection had a lower SVR rate than those with HCV2/3 infection (P<0.001). Our results suggest that both the common allele frequency and racial descent itself contribute to the difference in SVR rates across different population groups, and the common allele frequency may partly elucidate the different SVR rates in patients with different genotypes of HCV.
“…Interestingly, it has also been well documented that East Asians have higher SVR rates than patients of European ancestry. 22,23 The SVR rates across different population groups displayed a striking concordance with C allele frequency which emphasizes the greater importance of individual genotype than ethnicity in predicting treatment response. 24 A previous study from Germany, extended to HCV genotype 2 and 3 infected patients, also analyzed 200 healthy controls for comparison and reported the frequency of CC, CT, and TT genotypes with 49%, 42.5%, and 8.5%, respectively.…”
Section: Genotyping Of Il28b Polymorphism (Rs12979860c/t)mentioning
“…Secondly, ethnicity has been shown to be a major predictive factor for uptaking treatment in previous studies, with AfricanAmericans and Hispanics less likely than Caucasians to commence on treatment [14,15]. Asian patients were shown to have different social demographics and different modes of acquisition [16]. They also have different views on doctors' role in their health.…”
Current treatment uptake for CHC patients was suboptimal, as a large proportion of patients were either reluctant for treatment or not suitable for the current antiviral therapy. Multidisciplinary interventions are needed in the short term while alternative antiviral therapy is desired in the long term to overcome barriers to treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.