2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment processes for microplastics and nanoplastics in waters: State-of-the-art review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As, large MP particles can be further removed during the secondary treatment, they concentration in the secondary effluent is lower. Studies showed that MPs with size >300 mm only account for 8% after secondary treatment (Talvitie et al, 2016, Mintenig et al, 2017 However, several studies on this subject conclude that a tertiary treatment step is necessary for effective MPs removal from wastewater (Estahbanati et al, 2021).…”
Section: Insert Figure 183 Herementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As, large MP particles can be further removed during the secondary treatment, they concentration in the secondary effluent is lower. Studies showed that MPs with size >300 mm only account for 8% after secondary treatment (Talvitie et al, 2016, Mintenig et al, 2017 However, several studies on this subject conclude that a tertiary treatment step is necessary for effective MPs removal from wastewater (Estahbanati et al, 2021).…”
Section: Insert Figure 183 Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPs and NPs have been detected in freshwaters around the world (Eriksen et al, 2013 andWang et al, 2018), including polar regions (Mishra et al, 2021). However, as mentioned by Estahbanati et al (2021) in their review, interest of the scientific community in technologies for reducing and/or removing MPs and NPs in water is very recent. Especially, the first studies for NPs removal have been published less than 5 years ago, and publications on MPs and NPs removal increased twice between 2019 and 2020 (Estahbanati et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are several methods employed for the removal of NMPs from water [ 7 ], at least some of these methods are limited by minimum particle size and destructive methods are not useful for laboratory particle analysis. While purification and isolation methods (filtration, evaporation, solvent extraction, density separation, or gravitational separation) exist, due to the unique properties of nanoplastics, each of these methods has shortfalls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 12 The methodologies used to remove MP can be classified into two main groups: the more traditional methods, such as coagulation and filtration, 13 15 and emerging ones that remove MP with extremely high efficiencies. 16 18 Some noteworthy methods are photocatalytic micromotors such as BiVO 4 /Fe 3 O 4 19 and Au@Ni@TiO 2 , 20 surface-functionalized microbubbles, 21 froth flotation, 22 and surface functionalization of the MP with hypochlorite (ClO – ) 23 or magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ). 24 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%