2014
DOI: 10.1080/01488376.2014.915283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment Outcomes for At-Risk Young Children With Behavior Problems: Toward a New Definition of Success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to previous studies using EP (Fox & Holtz, 2009;Fung, Fox, & Harris, 2014). The results of this present study also are comparable with the results of TF-CBT research, which also used an RCT methodology (Sheeringa, Weems, Cohen, Amaya-Jackson, & Guthrie, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are similar to previous studies using EP (Fox & Holtz, 2009;Fung, Fox, & Harris, 2014). The results of this present study also are comparable with the results of TF-CBT research, which also used an RCT methodology (Sheeringa, Weems, Cohen, Amaya-Jackson, & Guthrie, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…(f) The child and primary caregiver completed the comprehensive intake evaluation and at least five treatment sessions. Previous studies conducted with a similar population with behavior problems without trauma used a minimum number of 3 treatment sessions as part of treatment completion criteria (Fung, Fox, & Harris, 2014). Given the complex nature of trauma, it was hypothesized that more minimum treatment sessions would be needed to produce change, and therefore participants were included in the final sample only if they completed at least five or more treatment sessions.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A unique strength of this study is that it is one of the first studies where all of the participants representing diverse populations were living in poverty and receiving a home-based treatment program. This study adds to the positive outcomes of previous studies supporting the use of EP with very young children in poverty (e.g., Fox et al, 2013; Fung, Fox, & Harris, 2014; Gresl et al, 2014) by examining treatment outcomes using a randomized treatment control methodology. After EP treatment, parents reported significant improvements in their child’s disruptive behaviors and an increase in their child’s positive prosocial behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Past treatment outcomes for EPP have demonstrated decreased frequency of the child’s challenging behaviors, increased positive parent–child interactions during play, decreased parental reliance on verbal and corporal punishment for discipline, improved parental expectations, and higher levels of nurturing at posttreatment (Fox & Holtz, 2009; Harris, Fox, & Love, 2015). These results have been shown to be effective across ethnicity, with low-income African American, Caucasian, and Latino families showing similar levels of improvement with treatment (Gresl et al, 2014); with children both with and without mild developmental delays (Holtz, Carrasco, Mattek, & Fox, 2009); and for achieving long-term maintenance of treatment gains at 1-year follow-up (Fung, Fox, & Harris, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%