2020
DOI: 10.3857/roj.2020.00073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment outcome of anaplastic ependymoma under the age of 3 treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Abstract: Ependymoma is the third most common pediatric brain tumor [1]. Thirty percent of all pediatric ependymomas occur in children below 3 years of age [2]. The 7-year local control and event-free survival rates in pediatric ependymoma patients undergoing current treatment regimens (maximal safe resection, followed by focal adjuvant radiotherapy [RT]) were reported to be 83.7% and 69.1%, respectively [3]. In particular, both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly worse in patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CSI is an essential treatment for pediatric brain tumors that tend to spread to the leptomeningeal space [1]. However, the volume irradiated by CSI is very large and a range of toxicities, including hematological and gastrointestinal complications, are observed during and after CSI [3][4][5][6][7]. Due to the absence of an exit dose for CSI compared with photon beams, it has been expected that PBT would reduce these toxicities [3,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CSI is an essential treatment for pediatric brain tumors that tend to spread to the leptomeningeal space [1]. However, the volume irradiated by CSI is very large and a range of toxicities, including hematological and gastrointestinal complications, are observed during and after CSI [3][4][5][6][7]. Due to the absence of an exit dose for CSI compared with photon beams, it has been expected that PBT would reduce these toxicities [3,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the large field size, a significant volume of normal organs is included in the irradiated area [2]. Therefore, various side effects, including hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities, are observed during and after CSI [3][4][5][6][7]. In an effort to reduce the potential toxicities related to CSI, advanced techniques have been adapted.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D a R T I C L E Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It indicates a decreased cellular heterogeneity of DNA methylation in the recurrent tumors, a result different from previous reports on the increased or expanded gene mutation loads in the recurrent cancers 39 . One possible explanation is that radiation therapy, which remains the mainstay of clinical treatment in pediatric EPNs 1,3,93 , selected or conditioned a subpopulation of surviving tumor cells for relapse. This result is clinically important as it suggested a possibility of targeting a small set of epigenetic drivers of recurrence for significantly improved efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ependymoma (EPN) is the third most common malignant brain tumor of childhood, accounting for up to 12% of intracranial tumors in children. Current therapy includes maximal surgical resection and focal radiation, resulting in a 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 70% and 57%, respectively [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] . However, nearly half of patients will experience late relapses 1,4,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the low-dose region does not seem to be most relevant for the development of second primary CNS tumors after cranial EBRT supporting the application of more conformal IMRT-based techniques. Although the successful therapy of pediatric primary CNS tumors is the major goal, there is an urgent need to lower the dose and volume of EBRT in the normal tissue and to organs at risk by highly dose-conformal IMRT, SBRT, and proton or hadron therapy in still physically and cognitively developing patients [ 320 , 329 , 330 , 331 ]. For pediatric CNS tumor patients, a large benefit is expected from the application of proton therapy allowing for a meaningful reduction of the dose burden to the healthy tissue with the option of simultaneous focal dose escalation in the tumor volume for highly resistant entities [ 35 , 320 ].…”
Section: Childhood Cancer and Second Primary Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%