2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of tibial plateau fractures: A comparison of two different operation strategies with medium-term follow up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research indicates that bilateral incision approaches can avoid relatively weak areas of the anterior tibial soft tissue, reducing extensive detachment of soft tissue at the fracture site. This helps to ensure optimal blood supply to the fracture site, greatly reducing the incidence of postoperative complications [12]. Moreover, literature supports that this surgical approach provides su cient operating space, enabling simultaneous treatment for concomitant knee joint soft tissue injuries, such as those to the cruciate ligament, collateral ligament, and meniscus, resulting in satisfactory clinical outcomes [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates that bilateral incision approaches can avoid relatively weak areas of the anterior tibial soft tissue, reducing extensive detachment of soft tissue at the fracture site. This helps to ensure optimal blood supply to the fracture site, greatly reducing the incidence of postoperative complications [12]. Moreover, literature supports that this surgical approach provides su cient operating space, enabling simultaneous treatment for concomitant knee joint soft tissue injuries, such as those to the cruciate ligament, collateral ligament, and meniscus, resulting in satisfactory clinical outcomes [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher score on this scale shows inferior outcomes. This scale has been widely approved for the Iranian population in terms of reliability and validity [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common treatment method for TPF is ORIF performed by plates and screws, which has been associated with acceptable clinical results. However, this method is associated with complications, the most important of which are: excessive bone damage and soft tissue damage, high risk of infection, and functional rehabilitation problems with delayed activity and scar formation [ 12 , 13 ]. Another treatment method for these patients is closed reduction and plastering, which is not recommended for adults due to the difficulty of maintaining the reduction in plaster and the possibility of complications such as malunion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this is highly consistent with the mechanical axis of the limbs, and the traction force of the joints and soft tissue and the natural axis of the human body are used for reduction, the reduction quality is significantly improved, and its traction force is also significantly enhanced ( 9 ). Current studies indicated that DRTR enjoyed significant advantages, such as its continuous and stable reduction effect and simple operation, compared with TT in treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures ( 8 , 10 ), femoral shaft fractures ( 9 ), distal femur fractures ( 11 ) and tibial plateau fractures ( 12 ), which has attracted extensive attention from orthopedic doctors. However, the clinical safety and efficacy of DRTR in treatment of elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%