1999
DOI: 10.1007/s005860050175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit by indirect reduction and posterior instrumentation: bisegmental stabilization with monosegmental fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
102
0
9

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
102
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…84.6% corresponded to Frankel E (16 cases), 2 cases to Frankel D (10.26%) and one patient to Frankel C (5.13%) [37,38]. Injured levels were: T12 (n=5, 20.8%), L1 (n=10, 41.7%), L2 (n=6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…84.6% corresponded to Frankel E (16 cases), 2 cases to Frankel D (10.26%) and one patient to Frankel C (5.13%) [37,38]. Injured levels were: T12 (n=5, 20.8%), L1 (n=10, 41.7%), L2 (n=6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical management presents potential benefits including neural decompression, spinal anatomy restoration and inmediate stability, which improves the integral rehabilitation of patients and allows them a rapid return to work [1,19,27,32,34,37,38,43,47,49,52,53]. Historically, most surgical techniques solved the problem of instability by fusion of mobile segments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations