1986
DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(86)90066-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of theophylline intoxication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors have made similar recommendations, although the threshold serum theophylline concentration for haemoperfusion has varied from 80 mg/l to 100 mg/I. 4,7,8,15,16 The experience of our series supports this selective use ofhaemoperfusion. Although well recognised as complications ofhaemoperfusion, we did not experience any clinically significant problems with hypocalcaemia, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Other authors have made similar recommendations, although the threshold serum theophylline concentration for haemoperfusion has varied from 80 mg/l to 100 mg/I. 4,7,8,15,16 The experience of our series supports this selective use ofhaemoperfusion. Although well recognised as complications ofhaemoperfusion, we did not experience any clinically significant problems with hypocalcaemia, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In the case of hPSC-CMs, two groups of treatment concentrations were determined according to the literature ( Aslaksen et al, 1981 ; Goldberg et al, 1986 ; Rowe et al, 1988 ; Higgins et al, 1995 ; Shannon, 1999 ). The “therapeutic concentration/overdose” group consisted of 10 µM, 100 µM, and 1 mM of aminophylline treatments, while the 10-mM aminophylline treatment was considered “severe overdose” concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further reports suggest that peak serum theophylline concentrations were a predictor of toxicity [55][56][57]. Even so, no consensus guidelines existed for when to employ hemoperfusion, with threshold serum theophylline levels ranging from 330 (59.4) to 550 μmol/L (99 μg/mL) [10,58,59]. Recommendations made by Park et al and revised by Goldberg et al suggest that hemoperfusion be performed in patients with a serum theophylline concentration greater than 80 μg/mL following an acute intoxication and in those with a serum level greater than 60 μg/mL with a chronic ingestion.…”
Section: What Are the Indications For Hemodialysis Or Hemoperfusion Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendations made by Park et al and revised by Goldberg et al suggest that hemoperfusion be performed in patients with a serum theophylline concentration greater than 80 μg/mL following an acute intoxication and in those with a serum level greater than 60 μg/mL with a chronic ingestion. They further suggested that those who could not tolerate oral charcoal were older than 60 years of age or had concurrent heart and liver dysfunction were at increased risk [58][59][60][61]. Extracorporeal elimination should be begun prior to onset of major toxicity involving seizures or dysrhythmias, since once these complications are present the use of enhanced elimination has not been shown to terminate such events [42].…”
Section: What Are the Indications For Hemodialysis Or Hemoperfusion Fmentioning
confidence: 99%