1999
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199905000-00029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of the Nasal Hump with Preservation of the Cartilaginous Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it appears a logical assumption that function would not be compromised in the CPD approach, this could be an issue in FLD procedures where the likelihood of airway compromise has been an initial concern. Several studies however reported positive functional outcomes with dorsal preservation, 4,8,10,14,31,[35][36][37][38][39] although in all instances the osseocartilaginous vault had been mobilized as a single unit. Our technique differs, since it implies a dorsal split and subsequent resuture (►Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While it appears a logical assumption that function would not be compromised in the CPD approach, this could be an issue in FLD procedures where the likelihood of airway compromise has been an initial concern. Several studies however reported positive functional outcomes with dorsal preservation, 4,8,10,14,31,[35][36][37][38][39] although in all instances the osseocartilaginous vault had been mobilized as a single unit. Our technique differs, since it implies a dorsal split and subsequent resuture (►Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Common to all of those, whether founded on surface or foundation techniques 7 and applying, symmetrically or not, a pushdown or letdown mobilization of the nasal pyramid on circumferential impaction osteotomies, is the key concept of preserving the whole nasal dorsum intact. A notable exception was that of a pushdown limited to the cartilaginous dorsum or extended to the bony cap, combined with conventional osteotomies of the bony vault, as described by Ishida et al [8][9][10][11] Although PR was described under a closed approach, it was also performed open by many, with the benefit of full visualization, precise piezo osteotomies, and piezo or burr osteoplasty, 12,13 together with the advantage of possibly combining with a structural approach to the tip. 3,4,14 This contemporary concept essentially constitutes a "hybrid" preservation-structural approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,9 The spare roof technique and the Ishida technique address only the nasal dorsum, in a superficial way, preserving the upper lateral cartilages (surface or dorsal modulation technique). [1][2][3][4]6,7 Thus, the spare roof technique is conceptually different from traditional preservation techniques and is supported by the anatomical concept of the spacial geometry, and the relation between the E-point and the beginning of the nasal hump 8 (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of the internal nasal valve (INV). 12,13 In 1898, Jacques Joseph performed one of the first recorded reduction rhinoplasty cases by engaging a genuinely open approach with split hump reduction. The same year, Boston's J. L. Goodale performed an endonasal subdorsal septal excision, which involved pushing the dorsum down.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same year, Boston's J. L. Goodale performed an endonasal subdorsal septal excision, which involved pushing the dorsum down. [10][11][12][13][14] Despite the variety of great minds at work in the field and some identified disadvantages of Joseph's method, such as the destructive nature of hump excision and the need to restore an open roof by medializing osteotomies, Joseph's approach to rhinoplasty became the preferred technique, evolving to introduce new techniques such as spreader grafts, camouflage grafts, and flaps. 14 Operating on a patient to remove a dorsal hump, Joseph described removing the subdorsal cartilage and lateral osteotomies to allow for the mobilization of the nasal vault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%