2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of the edentulous atrophic maxilla using zygomatic implants: evaluation of survival rates over 5–10 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ZI is considered as a successful alternative for rehabilitation of patients with severe maxillary atrophy; however, ZI insertion is a major surgery and can represent some risks (Aparicio, Manresa, Francisco, Ouazzani, et al, 2014;Brånemark et al, 2004;Candel-Marti, Carrillo-Garcia, Penarrocha-Oltra, & Penarrocha-Diago, 2012;Chrcanovic & Abreu, 2013;Chrcanovic, Albrektsson, & Wennerberg, 2016;D'Agostino et al, 2016;Grecchi et al, 2017;Goker et al, 2020;Yates et al, 2014). The possible complications of ZI surgery include sinusitis, soft tissue infections, paresthesia, and oroantral fistula, penetration of the orbital cavity during the drilling protocol, and failure of the implants (Filho, Amaral, Curra, dos Santos, & Cardoso, 2016;Maló, Nobre, Lopes, Ferro, & Moss, 2015;Nobre, Maló, & Gonçalves, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZI is considered as a successful alternative for rehabilitation of patients with severe maxillary atrophy; however, ZI insertion is a major surgery and can represent some risks (Aparicio, Manresa, Francisco, Ouazzani, et al, 2014;Brånemark et al, 2004;Candel-Marti, Carrillo-Garcia, Penarrocha-Oltra, & Penarrocha-Diago, 2012;Chrcanovic & Abreu, 2013;Chrcanovic, Albrektsson, & Wennerberg, 2016;D'Agostino et al, 2016;Grecchi et al, 2017;Goker et al, 2020;Yates et al, 2014). The possible complications of ZI surgery include sinusitis, soft tissue infections, paresthesia, and oroantral fistula, penetration of the orbital cavity during the drilling protocol, and failure of the implants (Filho, Amaral, Curra, dos Santos, & Cardoso, 2016;Maló, Nobre, Lopes, Ferro, & Moss, 2015;Nobre, Maló, & Gonçalves, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important variable that alters the zygomatic BIC is the angle at which the implant is placed [14]. According to the change of angle, the implant comes in contact with different anatomical portions of the fractured bone, which may lead to an increase or decrease of BIC [15][16][17]. The insertion angle can be estimated by computed tomography [19].…”
Section: Development and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Out of various treatments, zygomatic implants have been in clinical use for 20 years and is an excellent treatment plan for patients with severely resorbed fully or partially edentulous maxillary arches. 9 When direct alveolar support for conventional implants is lacking; Zygomatic implants offer a relatively measured approach to restore missing upper dentition. Parel et al developed the concept of remote implant anchorage from which the zygomatic implant is derived.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%