2019
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of telangiectasia on the cheeks with a compact yellow (585 nm) semiconductor laser and a green (532 nm) KTP laser: a randomized double‐blinded split‐face trial

Abstract: Conclusions:The investigational PhotoLase laser enables significantly faster treatments, but the process is somewhat more painful than with KTP, otherwise providing a similar clinical outcome in the treatment of facial telangiectasia. Treatment Protocol Lasers Surg. Med. 51:223-229, 2019.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Finnish group performed a split-face double-blinded study that compared the treatment efficacy of a 532 nm KTP laser with a new 585 nm laser in the management of cheek telangiectasias, showing similar results with both lasers, although physicians evaluated the KTP-treated side as the most improved. Pain score reported by patients was also higher on the 585 nm laser side [ 42 ]. Similar results were also obtained comparing the KTP laser with the 595 nm laser, showing that the 532 nm laser was slightly more effective but reporting a relatively higher rate of side effects [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Finnish group performed a split-face double-blinded study that compared the treatment efficacy of a 532 nm KTP laser with a new 585 nm laser in the management of cheek telangiectasias, showing similar results with both lasers, although physicians evaluated the KTP-treated side as the most improved. Pain score reported by patients was also higher on the 585 nm laser side [ 42 ]. Similar results were also obtained comparing the KTP laser with the 595 nm laser, showing that the 532 nm laser was slightly more effective but reporting a relatively higher rate of side effects [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of enlarged blood vessels on the face (facial telangiectasia), both KTP (532 nm) and PDL (585 nm) have been used [2]. Clinical results for these two lasers have turned out to be similar, but the pain level was higher with the yellow laser (PDL) compared to the green one (KTP).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lesions are found in 0.3% to 0.5% of newborn children [1]. Attempts to treat PWS and enlarged blood vessels on the face and legs [2] with different lasers started in the early 1980s [3]. However, to date, there is no single laser source that has been 100% effective in the treatment of all cases of PWS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In medicine, yellow laser emission has the highest ratio of oxyhemoglobin absorption versus melanin absorption, reducing the laser power needed for macular photocoagulation treatments in a 30–40% in comparison with green lasers and thus decreasing the risk of retinal damage . Yellow lasers have also proven their advantageous potential in skin therapies, such as treatment of vascular lesions, among others …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Yellow lasers have also proven their advantageous potential in skin therapies, such as treatment of vascular lesions, among others. [4] Despite the rapid progress in laser research in the past nearly 60 years, up to now there is no convincing simple and easy to handle solution to generate continuous-wave (cw) laser emission in the yellow spectral range. The most straightforward approach to generate laser emission relies on electrically pumped semiconductor materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%