1981
DOI: 10.1177/014107688107400801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Severe Anaphylactic Reactions to Insect Stings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ISP is more easily taken by inhalation than sublingually, since sublingual administration involves keeping a tablet under the tongue and trying to inhibit swallowing-for at least 10 minutes. In fact, it is difficult to see any justification for the continued use of this route of administration of ISP (see Ackroyd 1981). For patients who find it difficult to inhale ISP from pressurized canisters, an alternative form of therapy which might be investigated is the oral ad-ministration of protokylol, a derivative of ISP which is said to be effective when given by mouth (Weiner 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISP is more easily taken by inhalation than sublingually, since sublingual administration involves keeping a tablet under the tongue and trying to inhibit swallowing-for at least 10 minutes. In fact, it is difficult to see any justification for the continued use of this route of administration of ISP (see Ackroyd 1981). For patients who find it difficult to inhale ISP from pressurized canisters, an alternative form of therapy which might be investigated is the oral ad-ministration of protokylol, a derivative of ISP which is said to be effective when given by mouth (Weiner 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%