2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-008-0625-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma with an alternating chemotherapy regimen based on high-dose methotrexate

Abstract: International audiencePrimary mediastinal large B cell lymphomas (MLCL) differ from other diffuse large cell lymphomas, leading to a description as a separate entity in the current World Health Organization classification. Dose intensification improves long-term results, but no standard therapy has been established so far. We investigated the use of a high-dose methotrexate-based alternating chemotherapy regimen (B-ALL protocol of the German ALL study group) followed by consolidative mediastinal radiotherapy f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to the introduction of rituximab, the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) followed by radiotherapy (RT) had been considered suboptimal treatment for PMLBCL with cure rates generally not exceeding 50-60% [5,[11][12][13]. Combinations of methotrexate (or etoposide), doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin known as M(V) ACOP-B [14,15], dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (da-EPOCH) [16], Burkitt-like or acute lymphoblastic leukemia-like regimens such as the Memorial and GMALL protocols [12,17,18], and even consolidation of first-line response with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation [5] have all been considered superior to CHOP in rather small-to medium-sized patient series, albeit without head-to head randomized comparison. The introduction of rituximab greatly improved the results of CHOP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the introduction of rituximab, the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) followed by radiotherapy (RT) had been considered suboptimal treatment for PMLBCL with cure rates generally not exceeding 50-60% [5,[11][12][13]. Combinations of methotrexate (or etoposide), doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin known as M(V) ACOP-B [14,15], dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (da-EPOCH) [16], Burkitt-like or acute lymphoblastic leukemia-like regimens such as the Memorial and GMALL protocols [12,17,18], and even consolidation of first-line response with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation [5] have all been considered superior to CHOP in rather small-to medium-sized patient series, albeit without head-to head randomized comparison. The introduction of rituximab greatly improved the results of CHOP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singleinstitution or multiinstitution studies, mainly retrospective, showed that the combination of chemotherapy with CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone) or CHOP-like regimens and radiation therapy (RT) is highly effective, given the peculiarity of the disease presentation and the tendency to recurrence in the primary site of origin 3, 4, 5 and 6. In the rituximab era, current standard therapy is represented by a combination of chemotherapy (CHOP, CHOP-like, EPOCH -Etoposide, Prednisone, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, M/VACOP-B -Methotrexate/Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone and Bleomicine) and rituximab followed by RT, with a higher response rate to rituximab chemotherapy (R-CT) when in comparison with chemotherapy alone 7, 8 and 9. Inasmuch as the outcomes are still unsatisfactory in a limited number of patients, with global overall survival rates of approximately 80%, more aggressive programs have been investigated, including strategies evaluating high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cells transplantation upfront (10). The need of consolidation RT has also been questioned in patients in complete remission after R-CT (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In GMALL/B-ALL/NHL2002 regimen they have been moved to front line therapy to minimize risk of developing resistance to chemotherapy 17 . The GMALL/B-ALL/NHL2002 produced 90% ORR and 80% CR in PMBL patients 28 . After a median follow up of 8.6 years, 73% of patients achieved long-term disease free survival more than 2 years after start of therapy 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The GMALL/B-ALL/NHL2002 produced 90% ORR and 80% CR in PMBL patients 28 . After a median follow up of 8.6 years, 73% of patients achieved long-term disease free survival more than 2 years after start of therapy 28 . Our preliminary experience with GMALL/B-ALL/NHL2002 was promising 13 , 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%