2019
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of pediatric high‐grade central nervous system tumors with high‐dose methotrexate in combination with multiagent chemotherapy: A single‐institution experience

Abstract: BackgroundEffective treatment for pediatric embryonal brain tumors includes dose‐intensive multiagent chemotherapy (DIMAC) followed by high‐dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue (HDCSCR). Use of repeated cycles of DIMAC including high‐dose methotrexate (HDMTX) without HDCSCR has not been described.ProcedureWe retrospectively reviewed the responses/toxicities in 13 patients (aged 2‐155 months, median 22 months) with central nervous system (CNS) tumors (atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors, CNS embryonal tumors n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all, 344 articles were excluded after our full‐text screen, with reasons for exclusion provided in Figure 1. In total, 25 studies met inclusion criteria and had extractable data 7,8,20–42 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all, 344 articles were excluded after our full‐text screen, with reasons for exclusion provided in Figure 1. In total, 25 studies met inclusion criteria and had extractable data 7,8,20–42 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 2701 articles retrieved in the search, 44 studies with IPD on 298 patients with pineoblastoma were included in the systematic review ( Table 1 ) [ 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. Figure 1 presents the PRISMA flowchart for this systematic review [ 18 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%