2014
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Canada: A survey of genitourinary medical oncologists and urologists

Abstract: Introduction: Uptake of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has been low despite evidence of a survival benefit. The primary aim of this study was to better understand why the rates are low and determine what factors specifically influence the decision to recommend NC for MIBC. Methods: A 31-question survey was emailed between 2009 and 2011 to medical oncologists belonging to the Canadian Association of Genitourinary Medical Oncologists (CAGMO); and to urologists belonging t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with other reports, our results suggest that a multidisciplinary approach to MIBC management is critical to increase referral and rates of chemotherapy uptake (16,18,28). Further, our results support the need for physician advocates and institutional support and policy to increase chemotherapy uptake (16,28).…”
Section: Walker Et Al Barriers and Enablers Of Chemotherapy For Bladdsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with other reports, our results suggest that a multidisciplinary approach to MIBC management is critical to increase referral and rates of chemotherapy uptake (16,18,28). Further, our results support the need for physician advocates and institutional support and policy to increase chemotherapy uptake (16,28).…”
Section: Walker Et Al Barriers and Enablers Of Chemotherapy For Bladdsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The study did not explore barriers and enablers of chemotherapy delivery. In a survey of 51 Canadian MOs and urologists Hsu et al (18) found that >88% of respondents reported offering NACT to patients with MIBC. While the focus of Hsu's study was the impact of patient comorbidity on physician practice, the authors mention that provider-and system-level barriers to chemotherapy delivery included: belief that NACT does not improve survival, concern about disease progression during delivery of NACT, and lack of chemotherapy uptake in the community.…”
Section: Cuaj -Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A prime example of how a multidisciplinary model can influence treatment recommendations is the increase in the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in MIBC. Despite level 1 randomized clinical trial data supporting its clinical benefits, preoperative systemic therapy has traditionally had poor uptake in contemporary studies 13, 14 This low usage has been attributed to patient related factors (e.g., age, co-morbidities and stage), physician disbelief in the degree of benefit, and referral patterns at non-academic institutions 15, 17 A previous survey of genitourinary medical oncologists in Canada revealed that the referral rates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were the highest in the setting of an established care pathway or a multidisciplinary clinic 16 . Supporting this observation, other studies have demonstrated a significant increase in adherence to guidelines and utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the initiation of a multidisciplinary model 21, 22…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant systematic variation in NAC utilization rates also exist [117]. In settings where a multidisciplinary approach is used, rates of NAC use are higher, up to 50% [118,119]. This highlights the importance of ongoing multidisciplinary collaboration, patient and provider education.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (Nac)mentioning
confidence: 99%