2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of murine pneumonic Francisella tularensis infection with gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin or ciprofloxacin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Animal models of tularemia have principally been developed in the mouse and have proved to be very helpful tools in elucidating several aspects of disease pathogenesis, including the characterization of innate and adaptive immunity to F. tularensis, in testing the efficacy of antibiotics and other therapies (30,32,33,39) and vaccine candidates against the disease (7,13,34). Various methods of inducing disease have been used, and the respiratory route is of particular interest (11,42) due to the severity of pneumonic tularemia and the impact that aerosol spread might have in a bioterrorist attack.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal models of tularemia have principally been developed in the mouse and have proved to be very helpful tools in elucidating several aspects of disease pathogenesis, including the characterization of innate and adaptive immunity to F. tularensis, in testing the efficacy of antibiotics and other therapies (30,32,33,39) and vaccine candidates against the disease (7,13,34). Various methods of inducing disease have been used, and the respiratory route is of particular interest (11,42) due to the severity of pneumonic tularemia and the impact that aerosol spread might have in a bioterrorist attack.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, perhaps somewhat surprisingly, a single dose of oral ciprofloxacin also gave full protection against F. tularensis LVS, preventing differentiation between the efficacies of the antibiotics given by either route of administration. Oral ciprofloxacin treatment for 14 days does not fully protect against F. tularensis Schu S4 infection in mice (3), suggesting that the efficacy of the short treatment regimen used in this study against LVS does not reflect the efficacy against more virulent F. tularensis strains. The shortcomings of F. tularensis LVS as a model for understanding the gene function of more virulent strains has been highlighted previously (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Ideally, this prophylaxis would be highly effective and could be taken by patients without medical supervision. The currently recommended prophylactic options, oral ciprofloxacin and oral doxycycline, although easy to administer, have been associated with relapse in murine prophylaxis studies (3,23) and in some cases of human therapy (4,6). Therefore, there is the need for a new antibiotic, or a new presentation of an existing antibiotic, such as an alternative formulation and administration method, that can offer a higher level of protection against F. tularensis without the need for delivery by injection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies in mice have verified the successful use of fluoroquinolones in treating experimental tularemia, [69] including newer fluoroquinolones such as gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin [73,74]. One retrospective review described the successful treatment of 41 out of 43 patients with ciprofloxacin during a tularemia outbreak in Sweden [75].…”
Section: Review Hepburn and Simpsonmentioning
confidence: 99%