2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of municipal landfill leachate using a combined anaerobic digester and activated sludge system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
33
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximum COD removal efficiencies were 80% and 75.8% for attached and suspended growth, respectively. These results were consistent with the Kheradmand et al study [15] and Amin et al [16]. Amin et al studied a complementary treatment of leachate using a sequencing batch reactor (SBR).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Maximum COD removal efficiencies were 80% and 75.8% for attached and suspended growth, respectively. These results were consistent with the Kheradmand et al study [15] and Amin et al [16]. Amin et al studied a complementary treatment of leachate using a sequencing batch reactor (SBR).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…landfill is of intermediate age, it is beginning or is in the methanogenic stage, transforming the VFAs into methane and carbon dioxide (Renou et al, 2008;Kheradmand et al, 2010;Rivera-Laguna et al, 2013). However, although the content of organic matter, expressed as COD, is high, the BOD 5 /COD ratio is low, which indicates the decreased biodegradability of the leachates with age and coincides with what has been found by authors including Fátima et al (2012) and Ramírez-Sosa et al, (2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important process control parameters for anaerobic treatment are pH and alkalinity 22 . In the present study, the pH of the raw MWW in range 7.2-9.2 and it adjusted during treatment to pH 7.2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%