2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2019.e00142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma during pregnancy with a BRAF kinase inhibitor: A case report

Abstract: BackgroundMelanoma accounts for 8% of all malignancies encountered during pregnancy. BRAF kinase inhibitors have shown promise in the treatment of late-stage melanoma; however, there have been no studies and only one previous case report regarding its use in pregnancy.CaseA 25-year-old woman, gravida 1, at 20 weeks of gestation presented to the clinic with a complaint of a lump on her neck and dyspnea. She had had a melanoma that was surgically treated 5 years prior to her pregnancy. A biopsy was performed and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last ESMO clinical practice guidelines mention that ipilimumab (a monoclonal antibody against CTLA4) or vemurafenib (a BRAF inhibitor) should not be used during pregnancy because of the lack of safety data, proposing an alternative to interferon-alpha [ 17 ]. Even though contradictory findings have been reported for BRAF inhibitors [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors appears relatively safe based on several reports [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The last ESMO clinical practice guidelines mention that ipilimumab (a monoclonal antibody against CTLA4) or vemurafenib (a BRAF inhibitor) should not be used during pregnancy because of the lack of safety data, proposing an alternative to interferon-alpha [ 17 ]. Even though contradictory findings have been reported for BRAF inhibitors [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors appears relatively safe based on several reports [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, data on the use of vemurafenib during pregnancy are limited to case reports [ 37 , 39 , 145 ]. No fetal or neonatal malformations have been reported, but one case described intrauterine growth restriction that required a cesarean section at 30 WG.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animal studies (rats and rabbits), vemurafenib crosses the placenta without any teratogenic effects. In the literature are reported some cases of women treated with vemurafenib during pregnancy after the first trimester for metastatic melanoma, without any maternal and fetal side effects [151]. Maleka et al describe the case of one pregnant patient with metastatic melanoma who responded immediately to vemurafenib (with the shrinkage of tumor and normalization of transaminases).…”
Section: Vemurafenibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 56 In the few published case reports to date, no congenital malformations were described in newborns born to mothers treated with vemurafenib during pregnancy. 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 …”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible common side-effects of BRAF/MEK inhibition as well as of ICI include, but are not limited to, fever and gastrointestinal AEs. Only sporadic clinical evidence is available in the form of case reports, conveying favorable as well as unfavorable outcomes of ICI 62 , 69 or targeted therapy 56 , 58 , 59 in pregnant melanoma patients, for whom individual therapeutic decisions to continue or initiate melanoma therapy had to be taken due to specific, sometimes woeful circumstances. Based on the review of the literature, safety data and SmPC information, we conclude that for BRAF and MEK inhibition as well as for ICI a risk for impaired embryonal development and miscarriage exists.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%