2002
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b8.13508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of malignant bone tumours by extracorporeally irradiated autograft-prosthetic composite arthroplasty

Abstract: Autogenous bone graft which has been either autoclaved or irradiated is commonly used in oriental countries as an alternative to allograft. We started to use the technique of extracorporeal irradiation of the resected specimen and reimplantation (ECIR) in 1991. There was, however, a high incidence of fracture of the irradiated bone and loss of articular cartilage. In an attempt to reduce these complications, we combined the irradiated autograft with a conventional arthroplasty. Between 1995 and 1998, 14 patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
48
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Araki's series, infection, non-union, and fracture occurred 15, 20, and 25%, respectively (Araki et al 1999). In Chen's series, there was only one local recurrence in 13 stage-IIB OS treated by ERIR graft at a mean follow-up of 42 months, but a high complication rate was observed (Chen et al 2002). In our study, one patient (17%) had infection and there were no local recurrences from the irradiated grafts at a mean follow-up period of 73 months.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…In Araki's series, infection, non-union, and fracture occurred 15, 20, and 25%, respectively (Araki et al 1999). In Chen's series, there was only one local recurrence in 13 stage-IIB OS treated by ERIR graft at a mean follow-up of 42 months, but a high complication rate was observed (Chen et al 2002). In our study, one patient (17%) had infection and there were no local recurrences from the irradiated grafts at a mean follow-up period of 73 months.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…The most commonly used reconstructive techniques after proximal humeral resection include osteoarticular allografts [6,7,12,13,24,25], allograft-or autograftprosthesis composites [3,5,15], and endoprosthetic reconstruction [1, 4, 6, 8, 17, 18, 20, 24-26, 28, 31]. Alternative techniques include allograft arthrodesis, Tikhoff-Linberg resection and modifications, claviculo pro humero, vascularized fibula transfers, and concomitant scapular replacement [21,22,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When osteoarticular allografts were used for the proximal humerus reconstructions, mean MSTS scores were 21.0 to 22.2 [12,22,28], and 65% to 83% of patients had satisfactory function [1,19]. Chen et al [8] reported MSTS scores for wide resection of malignant bone tumors and reconstruction with an allograft-prosthetic composite. Only two patients in their study had tumors of the proximal humerus with mean MSTS scores of 24 and 27 [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%