1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62894-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Male Urethral Strictures: Is Repeated Dilation or Internal Urethrotomy Useful?

Abstract: Dilation and internal urethrotomy are useful in a select group (approximately 70% of all patients) who are stricture-free at 3 months, and of whom 50 to 60% will remain stricture-free up to 48 months. A second dilation or urethrotomy for early stricture recurrence (at 3 months) is of limited value in the short term (24 months) but of no value in the long term (48 months), whereas a third repeated dilation or urethrotomy is of no value.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
174
1
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
174
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in both countries, the common perception is that internal urethrotomy or dilation is appropriate management of strictures that, based on currently available evidence, would be better treated with urethroplasty. Several series demonstrate that the success rate with urethral dilation or urethrotomy for strictures over 2cm or recurrent strictures in unacceptably low (2,3). Yet, rather than a misunderstanding about treatment effectiveness, these practice patterns may merely represent the reality that properly trained reconstructive urologists are not available in many parts of the world, even in highly industrialized countries like the Netherlands and U.S. Only 3% of urologists surveyed performed more than 5 urethroplasties a year.…”
Section: Editorial Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in both countries, the common perception is that internal urethrotomy or dilation is appropriate management of strictures that, based on currently available evidence, would be better treated with urethroplasty. Several series demonstrate that the success rate with urethral dilation or urethrotomy for strictures over 2cm or recurrent strictures in unacceptably low (2,3). Yet, rather than a misunderstanding about treatment effectiveness, these practice patterns may merely represent the reality that properly trained reconstructive urologists are not available in many parts of the world, even in highly industrialized countries like the Netherlands and U.S. Only 3% of urologists surveyed performed more than 5 urethroplasties a year.…”
Section: Editorial Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By incising the urethra via urethrotomy, the vascularity within the underlying corpus spongiosum might be destroyed during the procedure, which could exacerbate the ischemic spongiofibrosis and lead to the recurrence of stricture. In light of this, the place of DVIU in the treatment algorithm for male urethral stricture disease has been questioned (Heyns et al, 1998;Hudak et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When performed to manage recurrent strictures, the cure rate approaches zero, when cure is defined as durable wide urethral patency without the need for subsequent treatment to maintain a wide caliber. 9,10 It is our observation that dilation is an overused management option, because patients with urethral stricture disease are often treated with dilation when they can be cured with a properly performed urethroplasty. We are in no way suggesting that direct vision balloon dilation may offer a higher cure rate than other dilation methods.…”
Section: Role In Urologic Practicementioning
confidence: 99%