1985
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.145.4.665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of intussusception with small bowel obstruction: application of decision analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several clinicians have reported that they carry out the examination for every child presenting with intussusception, provided that the correct principles of the procedure are rigorously observed,4 but some increase the pressure to as much as 14-72 kPa (150 cm H20), use bimanual manipulation, and make as many as 10 attempts at hydrostatic reduction. 1 3The risk of perforating the bowel during barium enema reduction is less than 1%,5 6 and bowel resection because of irreducibility or non-viability is necessary in about 12%. [7][8][9][10][11] Signs of peritonitis or bowel perforation are absolute contraindications to hydrostatic reduction, but there is no consensus about the duration of symptoms (over 24 or 48 hours) and evidence of small bowel obstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinicians have reported that they carry out the examination for every child presenting with intussusception, provided that the correct principles of the procedure are rigorously observed,4 but some increase the pressure to as much as 14-72 kPa (150 cm H20), use bimanual manipulation, and make as many as 10 attempts at hydrostatic reduction. 1 3The risk of perforating the bowel during barium enema reduction is less than 1%,5 6 and bowel resection because of irreducibility or non-viability is necessary in about 12%. [7][8][9][10][11] Signs of peritonitis or bowel perforation are absolute contraindications to hydrostatic reduction, but there is no consensus about the duration of symptoms (over 24 or 48 hours) and evidence of small bowel obstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He was again discharged from the hospital but returned 2 weeks later with a temperature of 39.0°C, pulse of 190 beats per minute, vomiting, and severe diarrhea. His white blood cell count was 16.3 X10V L, with 0.76 segmented neutrophils, 0.20 band cells, and 0.03 lymphocytes. The abdomen was quiet, distended, and slightly tender.…”
Section: Report Of a Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a long intestinal tube has been shown to be potentially useful in selected cases of small bowel obstruction but is generally reserved for patients with high operative risks. 3,4 Hydrostatic reduction with a barium enema is primarily used for intestinal intussusception 5 and is not suitable for small bowel obstruction of other causes. Additionally, hydrostatic reduction is associated with an increased risk of perforation in patients with small bowel obstruction.…”
Section: Which One Of the Following Is The Most Reasonable Next Step mentioning
confidence: 99%