1991
DOI: 10.1177/000348949110000204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Intractable Aspiration Using a Laryngeal Stent or Obturator

Abstract: Twenty-five patients were treated with a laryngeal stent for potentially reversible chronic aspiration of life-threatening magnitude. The causes of the intractable aspiration were diverse and included chronic neurologic disease, extensive head and neck surgery, and severe gastroesophageal reflux. The advantages of this technique are noted in comparison to those of more invasive procedures. Disadvantages of the laryngeal stent and complications encountered are also covered. The long-term results show that all b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment of intractable aspiration using a laryngeal stent or obturator was reported by Weisberger [12]. It is very effective temporary solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Treatment of intractable aspiration using a laryngeal stent or obturator was reported by Weisberger [12]. It is very effective temporary solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usually simple to insert endoscopically. However, leakage around the stent and laryngeal ulceration are adverse complications [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown to be somewhat effective and easy to place endoscopically, however was associated with leakage around the stent, laryngeal ulceration and patient discomfort [11]. It has not gained widespread acceptance as a technique for prevention of chronic aspiration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical options primarily involve the use of antimuscarinic agents to reduce saliva production. The surgical options available include bilateral submandibular gland excision and parotid duel ligation, tracheostomy with or without stent insertion, and laryngotracheal separation procedures [3, 4]. The most effective procedure to prevent salivary aspiration is laryngotracheal separation, which involves forming an end tracheostomy and connecting the oesophagus to the proximal trachea, thus producing total isolation of the airway [5, 6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%