2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Intermittent Locking of the Jaw in Wilkes Stage II Derangement by Arthroscopic Lysis and Lavage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature currently available is not conclusive on this topic [10,11,18] . On the one hand, it has been suggested that patients with less advanced disease tend to have higher success rates when treated with arthroscopy and that cases with more severe disease need open surgery for optimal long-term results [18][19][20][21] . On the other hand, it has been argued that arthroscopy ultimately provides fewer bene ts for stage II than for the most severely affected stages [10,22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature currently available is not conclusive on this topic [10,11,18] . On the one hand, it has been suggested that patients with less advanced disease tend to have higher success rates when treated with arthroscopy and that cases with more severe disease need open surgery for optimal long-term results [18][19][20][21] . On the other hand, it has been argued that arthroscopy ultimately provides fewer bene ts for stage II than for the most severely affected stages [10,22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the current survey 93.9% disagreed with the statement "arthroscopic surgery is almost completely effective in repositioning the disk in patients with internal derangements", and 96.7% disagreed with the statement "an extensive history of previous treatment failures in a TMD patient is usually an indication for surgery" while on the original survey 100% of the respondents among the group of experts disagreed with both statements. The literature regarding arthroscopic surgery success in repositioning disk (30)(31)(32)(33), and regarding the indication for surgery in TMD patients (33,34) is not conclusive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, usually there is no constant limitation in mouth opening. [ 14 ] On the other hand, MIO should be considered the primary outcome variable for patients suffering from intermediate/late ID, as it reliably reflects the change after arthroscopy. There are different types of intracapsular TMJ disorders that are so different in diagnosis and treatment that they should not be lumped together when reporting the treatment results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%