1965
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(65)90122-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of injuries to the colon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present series, the percentage of primary colonic repair procedures was higher in the right than the left colons, and was also high in the sigmoid colon area. Despite known anatomical and physiological differences, penetrating trauma to both the right and left colons can be managed similarly5, 13, 19, 20. Resection with end‐to‐end anastomosis was indicated in patients with massive colon injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present series, the percentage of primary colonic repair procedures was higher in the right than the left colons, and was also high in the sigmoid colon area. Despite known anatomical and physiological differences, penetrating trauma to both the right and left colons can be managed similarly5, 13, 19, 20. Resection with end‐to‐end anastomosis was indicated in patients with massive colon injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients in this series were young, healthy and physically active. Age has been shown to be an important factor influencing the mortality rate10, 20. The incidence of anastomotic leak was 6·5 per cent after primary repair and 1·4 per cent after colostomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pioneering work from New Orleans describing selective management of colon injury stimulated increased use of this approach at other institutions. Tucker and Fey [18], Roof et al [19], Vannix et al [20], Wolma and Williford [21], Beall et al [22] and Bartizal et al [23] subsequently reported retrospective studies demonstrating favorable outcomes after selective management of colon injuries. The consensus of these reviews advocated primary repair of the colonand ushered in a new wave of prospective randomized studies that form the basis for modern management.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%