2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of in-stent restenosis using a paclitaxel-eluting stent: acute results and long-term follow-up of a matched-pair comparison with intracoronary $beta;-radiation therapy

Abstract: Implantation of a non-polymer based paclitaxel-elution stent and conventional ICR therapy for complex ISR lead to comparable acute and long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary observational studies have demonstrated encouraging results with the use of these new stents in patients with ISR (11)(12)(13)(14). Moreover, recent studies suggest that drug-eluting stents might even be superior to brachytherapy which, up to now, constitutes the only proven effective therapy in this challenging scenario (15)(16)(17).…”
Section: See Page 2161mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary observational studies have demonstrated encouraging results with the use of these new stents in patients with ISR (11)(12)(13)(14). Moreover, recent studies suggest that drug-eluting stents might even be superior to brachytherapy which, up to now, constitutes the only proven effective therapy in this challenging scenario (15)(16)(17).…”
Section: See Page 2161mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 6 months, the restenosis rate was 20% in the PES group and 16% in the brachytherapy group (P = 1.0), but PES implantation resulted in significantly larger in-stent MLD (P = 0.03) and in-stent net gain (P = 0.04). TLR at 12 months was not significantly different between the two treatment groups [31]. Another comparative study came from the Netherlands.…”
Section: In-stent Restenosismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similarly, Paclitaxel possesses strong cytotoxicity and poor selectivity, so it inhibits the proliferation of smooth MCs and hurts normal cells at the same time, which may bring about distal stimulating effect and cause long-term restenosis, explaining the fact of 20% restenosis in 6 months. [3][4][5][6][7] In 2005, Aoki J from Toronto University reported that the third generation bioengineered stent captures cells in peripheral blood and accelerates natural repair of blood vessels by loading antibody in the coating. The CD34 stent was developed with CD34 antibody fixed by Teflon on the surface, and it accelerates endothelialization of blood vessels by capturing endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in peripheral blood to injured regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%