2012
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Hammertoe Deformity Using a One-piece Intramedullary Device: A Case Series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14 In 2012, a case series demonstrated the successful use of a 1-piece hammertoe system in 7 toes in 3 patients. At approximately 1 year postoperative, no complications were seen and all patients were satisfied with the cosmetic appearance of their corrected toes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13,14 In 2012, a case series demonstrated the successful use of a 1-piece hammertoe system in 7 toes in 3 patients. At approximately 1 year postoperative, no complications were seen and all patients were satisfied with the cosmetic appearance of their corrected toes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At approximately 1 year postoperative, no complications were seen and all patients were satisfied with the cosmetic appearance of their corrected toes. 13 In 2013, we reported a review of our past 253 hammertoe corrections. 14 Of the 63 Pro-Toe VO hammertoe implants used, only 4 patients developed a malunion, all being asymptomatic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The degree of bone-to-bone contact remained constant thereafter, because each component of the implant was screwed into the corresponding phalanx and, as such, could not piston, rotate, or flex. Resistance to flexion, rotation, and pistoning is a feature of certain intramedullary fixation devices that are threaded, those that effect interfragmental compression, and those that are not simply round in the cross-section (15). If desired, the surgeon could position the components of the intramedullary implant such that, on coupling, a gap will be maintained between the phalangeal surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is characterized by concomitant flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) and hyperextension of the metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) (3,4). Numerous procedures have been described for the correction of the HT deformity, ranging from interphalangeal (IP) arthroplasty with or without tendon transfer and temporary Kirschner wire (K-wire) stabilization to PIPJ fusion using any of a wide range of fixation devices, including a K-wire (5,6) or wires (7), sutures (8), single and multicomponent internal fixation devices (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), PIPJ fusion augmented with a bone graft (16), and combinations of interphalangeal (IP) manipulations with MTPJ relocation and stabilization (17). Regardless of the surgical technique used, the goals of surgery are to correct the deformity (or limit its progression) and alleviate pain.…”
Section: B S T R a C Tmentioning
confidence: 99%