2002
DOI: 10.1097/00132589-200206000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Glenoid Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9,11 Posterior rim fractures larger than 33% of the glenoid surface are also considered unstable and warrant fixation. 12 Intra-articular steps larger than 5 mm are considered to have a significant risk of secondary arthrosis, 2,3,11,12,18,20 and residual joint incongruity of as little as 3 mm is associated with poor functional outcome. 2,18,20 Although most authors recommend open reduction and internal fixation for displaced glenoid fractures, 3,11,12,18,20,28 arthroscopically assisted fixation in case studies has been described with good clinical results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9,11 Posterior rim fractures larger than 33% of the glenoid surface are also considered unstable and warrant fixation. 12 Intra-articular steps larger than 5 mm are considered to have a significant risk of secondary arthrosis, 2,3,11,12,18,20 and residual joint incongruity of as little as 3 mm is associated with poor functional outcome. 2,18,20 Although most authors recommend open reduction and internal fixation for displaced glenoid fractures, 3,11,12,18,20,28 arthroscopically assisted fixation in case studies has been described with good clinical results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Intra-articular steps larger than 5 mm are considered to have a significant risk of secondary arthrosis, 2,3,11,12,18,20 and residual joint incongruity of as little as 3 mm is associated with poor functional outcome. 2,18,20 Although most authors recommend open reduction and internal fixation for displaced glenoid fractures, 3,11,12,18,20,28 arthroscopically assisted fixation in case studies has been described with good clinical results. 1,8,10,34 Our study was conducted to further develop techniques for arthroscopically assisted percutaneous fixation of glenoid fractures and, in particular, to assess the risks of neurovascular injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anterior rim fractures involving greater than 25 % of the articular surface are relatively indicated for operative fixation [3,53]. Posterior rim fractures larger than 33 % of the articular glenoid surface have also been considered unstable and warrant operative intervention [54].…”
Section: Intraarticular Surgical Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extensive dissection required for adequate visualization, potential impairment of vascular supply to bony fragments, and postoperative stiffness and weakness have led to an increase in the use of arthroscopic techniques. 2,3 As with any intra-articular fracture fixation, the goals are pain relief, return of function, and prevention of long-term sequelae such as arthrofibrosis and osteoarthritis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%