2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Gingival Recession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the most common clinical solution for large oral mucosa defects is the use of graft tissues obtained from the same patient or from tissue donors (de Souza et al, 2008;Kassab et al, 2010;Novaes et al, 2007;Paolantonio et al, 2002). This practice can be used instead of autologous graft techniques of palatal connective tissues (Langer and Langer, 1985), which may cause high morbidity for the patient and also may provoke a diminution in the available mucosa for further surgical procedures (Fujioka and Fujii, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the most common clinical solution for large oral mucosa defects is the use of graft tissues obtained from the same patient or from tissue donors (de Souza et al, 2008;Kassab et al, 2010;Novaes et al, 2007;Paolantonio et al, 2002). This practice can be used instead of autologous graft techniques of palatal connective tissues (Langer and Langer, 1985), which may cause high morbidity for the patient and also may provoke a diminution in the available mucosa for further surgical procedures (Fujioka and Fujii, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical treatment of gingival recession has been performed to improve esthetics, decrease root sensitivity, and eliminate the patients’ concerns about the loss of teeth. Various surgical techniques have been used, including free gingival/connective tissue/acellular dermal matrix grafting, various flap designs, combinations of grafting techniques and flap designs, and regenerative approaches 2‐9 . Although almost all of them produced statistically significant clinical improvements, different rates of success and predictability have been documented both between and within these procedures 2‐9 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various surgical techniques have been used, including free gingival/connective tissue/acellular dermal matrix grafting, various flap designs, combinations of grafting techniques and flap designs, and regenerative approaches 2‐9 . Although almost all of them produced statistically significant clinical improvements, different rates of success and predictability have been documented both between and within these procedures 2‐9 . Systematic reviews assessing the best available evidence in the periodontal literature to detect significant differences in the effectiveness of different surgical techniques have revealed that subepithelial connective tissue grafts have the highest effectiveness and predictability in recession reduction 10‐12 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autogenous and allografting material have been used to augment the gingival dimensions 7–10. The aim of this case report is to present a clinical case with soft tissue grafting procedures, including combining autogenous and allograft material to augment the gingival tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%