2018
DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Frontal Secondary Headache Attributed to Supratrochlear and Supraorbital Nerve Entrapment With Oral Medication or Botulinum Toxin Type A vs Endoscopic Decompression Surgery

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Endoscopic surgical decompression of the supratrochlear nerve (STN) and supraorbital nerve (SON) is a new treatment for patients with frontal chronic headache who are refractory to standard treatment options. OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare treatment outcomes of oral medication, botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) injections, and endoscopic decompression surgery in frontal secondary headache attributed to STN and supraorbital SON entrapment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective cohort study o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our review the most frequently used methods were MHI 7 , 28 , 34 , 36 and the headache questionnaire. 36 – 38 , 40 , 42 Quality of life documentation before and after a migraine surgery is exiguous, mirroring the literature regarding trigger site decompression surgery. In our opinion, to improve the migraine surgery effect reporting, future investigations should spotlight what is the most complete evaluation method to universalize outcome measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In our review the most frequently used methods were MHI 7 , 28 , 34 , 36 and the headache questionnaire. 36 – 38 , 40 , 42 Quality of life documentation before and after a migraine surgery is exiguous, mirroring the literature regarding trigger site decompression surgery. In our opinion, to improve the migraine surgery effect reporting, future investigations should spotlight what is the most complete evaluation method to universalize outcome measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…From the 16 selected studies, 6 were retrospective studies, 7 , 32 34 , 37 , 39 11 were prospective studies, 28 31 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 40 42 of which 1 was a blinded randomized cohort study, 41 1 was a double-blind, sham surgery, controlled clinical trial, 30 and 1 was a cross sectional study. 40 A total of 628 patients were included in the review, and the sample size of each study ranged from 10 to 132 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations