Treatment of Excessive Tibial Plateau Angle

Kowaleski, Michael P.

doi:10.1002/9781119261728.ch30

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…8 However, many stifles with partial rupture do not have palpable instability, 9 10 which may be related to the origin of the tear, such as one isolated to a single bundle (craniomedial versus caudolateral). 11 Confirmation of CrCL tear is usually made at the time of arthrotomy or arthroscopy. 8 12 Survey radiographs are typically obtained as part of the diagnostic protocol, but only provide indirect suggestion of cruciate injury such as increased synovial volume, cranial tibial displacement, fat pad displacement and distal popliteal sesamoid displacement.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultrashort Echo Time Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Cruciate Ligaments in Normal Beagles

Socha,

Pownder,

Kayano

et al. 2024

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this study was to provide normative ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging (UTE MRI) data of the patellar ligament (PL), cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) and caudal cruciate ligament (CdCL) in non-lame Beagles. Study Design Eight stifles from four subjects obtained immediately postmortem were imaged using UTE MRI in the true sagittal plane. Regions of interest were drawn manually and the total (T2*), short T2* (T2*S) and long T2* (T2*L) values of the signal decay were calculated to evaluate the bound and free water components of the tendon. The T2*S, T2*L and T2* values were compared between the PL, CrCL and CdCL Results The mean and standard deviation of T2*S, T2*L and T2* were as follows: 0.54 ± 0.13, 4.65 ± 1.08 and 8.35 ± 0.82 ms for the PL; 0.46 ± 0.14, 5.99 ± 0.52 and 8.88 ± 0.4 ms for the CrCL and 0.41 ± 0.13, 7.06 ± 0.57 and 9.26 ± 0.18 ms for the CdCL. Significant differences were found between the T2*L component of the PL and each CrCL/CdCL and a smaller difference was noted between the T2*L of the CrCL and CdCL (p = 0.05). No difference of the T2*S value was found between any of the ligaments. Conclusion Establishing normative UTE data of the canine stifle is valuable for comparison in future studies in which normal and damaged ligaments may be evaluated, particularly in those affected limbs in which no instability is identified on physical examination in which normal and damaged ligaments may be evaluated.

show abstract