2015
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(15)30026-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of distal intraarticular tibial fractures: A biomechanical evaluation of intramedullary nailing vs. angle-stable plate osteosynthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Biomechanically, an intramedullary implant has been shown to be superior in axial loading stress, whereas being equivocal under torsional loads compared with a medial plate construct, thus perhaps permitting earlier weight-bearing. 4 The use of an intramedullary implant is advised in patients with distal tibia injury patterns as they result in decreased soft tissue dissection, and possibly allow earlier weight-bearing. 4 The use of an intramedullary implant is advised in patients with distal tibia injury patterns as they result in decreased soft tissue dissection, and possibly allow earlier weight-bearing.…”
Section: The Selection Of the Appropriate Implant For Fracture Fixatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Biomechanically, an intramedullary implant has been shown to be superior in axial loading stress, whereas being equivocal under torsional loads compared with a medial plate construct, thus perhaps permitting earlier weight-bearing. 4 The use of an intramedullary implant is advised in patients with distal tibia injury patterns as they result in decreased soft tissue dissection, and possibly allow earlier weight-bearing. 4 The use of an intramedullary implant is advised in patients with distal tibia injury patterns as they result in decreased soft tissue dissection, and possibly allow earlier weight-bearing.…”
Section: The Selection Of the Appropriate Implant For Fracture Fixatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our patient had malunited tibial fracture for 20 years and skin coverage over deformity site was adequate. Intramedullary nail helped in early weight bearing as it is load sharing device [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found IMN to be significantly more durable with regard to axial loadings, while no significant difference was found with respect to torsional loading. 9 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment options for distal tibial fractures remain quite controversial. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 Intramedullary nailing, osteosynthesis with plates, and external fixation methods are used. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%