2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000175683.81260.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with High-Dose Oral Terbinafine: A Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Abstract: Treatment with terbinafine failed to improve the symptoms or radiographic appearance of chronic rhinosinusitis even when nasal irrigation samples were positive for fungus on culture. One consideration is that the fungi isolated were not a major pathologic factor in this cohort. It is also possible that, even at high dose, terbinafine may not have maintained therapeutic levels in the nasal secretions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…361,376 Numerous studies, including multiple RCTs, have examined the role of antifungal treatment in CRS and none have shown a clinically meaningful improvement. [377][378][379][380][381] Although not directly addressing fungus as an etiologic factor, these clinical studies cast significant doubt on the role of fungus in the etiology of CRS.…”
Section: S55mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…361,376 Numerous studies, including multiple RCTs, have examined the role of antifungal treatment in CRS and none have shown a clinically meaningful improvement. [377][378][379][380][381] Although not directly addressing fungus as an etiologic factor, these clinical studies cast significant doubt on the role of fungus in the etiology of CRS.…”
Section: S55mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…379 Kennedy et al 379 recruited 53 adult CRS patients and randomized them into 2 groups in a DBRCT. Patients who had sinus surgery within the 3 months prior to screening were not considered for this study.…”
Section: S93mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is often pointed out that this system lacks sufficient levels of gradation for tracking progression or reduction of the disease volume [5]. Three more detailed staging systems, which are modifications of the L-M system, have been reported in recent years to help resolve these deficiencies [5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 Three more trials were included in this review. 36,37,39 No meta-analysis was performed in the study by Lim et al 46 Rather, it was purely qualitative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All trials were free of selective reporting. All but one trial 39 provided an allocation table or otherwise stated that the two groups were similar at baseline. It was noted that the Mayo Clinic is a collaborative partner with Accentia Biopharmeuticals, a company that holds the worldwide, exclusive commercial rights to SinuNase (topical amphotericin B, Accentia Biopharmaceuticals, Tampa, FL), 26 and that Ponikau holds a patent for this product.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias In Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%